Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
AnAngryAmerican

Grade the Fangio Hire

Your Grade for the Fangio/Kubiak Co-HC Pairing  

26 members have voted

  1. 1. Your grade for Fangio/Kubiak?

    • A
      2
    • B
      17
    • C
      6
    • D
      1
    • F
      0
    • Vance
      0
    • Mac
      0


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, thebestever6 said:

Credit .... the only reason we hired Vangio was to have a co coordinator head coach thing. And it all erodes after the hire it makes no sense.

 

The "only" reason they hired Fangio was because he was their favorite candidate they interviewed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, thebestever6 said:

We are the Browns officially how dysfunctional does this look.  

Yeah I'd say regardless of the results this looks like it was pretty messy lmao 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BroncoBruin said:

The "only" reason they hired Fangio was because he was their favorite candidate they interviewed. 

I don't believe that the plan always was have Vangio take care of the D and kubiak was to have a big role with the o. We blocked teams from interviewing Kubiak. 

 

This fell through because of staffing issues which should of been talked about prior to the head coach hire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, BroncoBruin said:

Yeah, missing out on Round 3 of Brian Pariani and Rick Dennison is terrible. xD

 

The two main issues are that we may not have an experienced HC on the staff now, and we may not have an experienced offensive play caller on the staff now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BroncoBruin said:

The "only" reason they hired Fangio was because he was their favorite candidate they interviewed. 

I’m sure circumstance was part of it though, and now that’s changed. This is all such a joke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, thebestever6 said:

I don't believe that the plan always was have Vangio take care of the D and kubiak was to have a big role with the o. We blocked teams from interviewing Kubiak. 

 

This fell through because of staffing issues which should of been talked about prior to the head coach hire.

Schefter clarified that the team was not blocking Kubiak, he did not want to leave. 

Why should staffing issues be hammered out before the head coach is hired? He's the head coach. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, thebestever6 said:

I don't believe that the plan always was have Vangio take care of the D and kubiak was to have a big role with the o. We blocked teams from interviewing Kubiak. 

This fell through because of staffing issues which should of been talked about prior to the head coach hire.

This is exactly right. The plan was co-HC similar to the Kubes/Wade paring. 

And here I was posting in the other thread lol. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today's news should be assuaging a lot of people's concerns about Elway's refusal to adapt and the nepotism within the organization. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BroncoBruin said:

Today's news should be assuaging a lot of people's concerns about Elway's refusal to adapt and the nepotism within the organization. 

To an extent, yes. But it definitely brings up other concerns. Mainly, what appears to be a shocking lack of communication and preparedness. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, broncosfan_101 said:

To an extent, yes. But it definitely brings up other concerns. Mainly, what appears to be a shocking lack of communication and preparedness. 

This is browns post 1999 dysfunctional. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, BroncoBruin said:

Today's news should be assuaging a lot of people's concerns about Elway's refusal to adapt and the nepotism within the organization. 

 

And who the hell do you suggest (a) calls the plays on offense? And (b) is the experienced HC that all rookie HC’s need by their side?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, broncosfan_101 said:

To an extent, yes. But it definitely brings up other concerns. Mainly, what appears to be a shocking lack of communication and preparedness. 

Fair, but if they end up with an innovative offensive mind + Munchak...this is all a net positive. Things have been too leaky recently and the optics aren't great. If things weren't so leaky, this is a non-issue. 

My question is: knowing what we know about Kubiak, did John really think he wasn't going to bring back his buddies? The guy is totally unwilling to adapt. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I don’t get is if Elway wanted the young hot shot with the new/college offense why not interview more than just Brian Taylor?

Talk about dysfunction. Yikes. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  



×