broncofan48 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 1 minute ago, thebestever6 said: Any oc we interview if they have success helping our offense they're gone in a year. This makes our long term health on offense look bleak. So we should only hire retreads then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroncoBruin Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 Just now, broncofan48 said: So we should only hire retreads then? Nobody in their right mind chooses stability for the sake of stability over success. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big_palooka Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 Can we stop saying Munchak is the "best Oline coach in the game". That title is reserved for Dante Scarnecchia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroncoBruin Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 1 minute ago, big_palooka said: Can we stop saying Munchak is the "best Oline coach in the game". That title is reserved for Dante Scarnecchia. Sure, he can be 1, Munchak can be 2. Whatever you want. He's phenomenal as an OL coach, so who cares? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elwayfan07 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 I don't disagree with the decision not to bring back Kubiak. If he was going to bring back Dennison and others, it showed this offense was not going to evolve. It was the right move. However, the problem is how is this just coming up now. Like 2 weeks ago when they first mentioned Kubiak would be back, how did they not have the conversation then? There is no reason this should play out in public. Its water under the bridge now. The question is who can we move on to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnAngryAmerican Posted January 11, 2019 Author Share Posted January 11, 2019 40 minutes ago, paul-mac said: You mean Zac Taylor? Bengals hired him to be the head coach I didn’t hear that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
germ-x Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 I think is more Fangio decision than an Elway one, at least I hope so. If Elway and Kubiak had philosophical differences this entire search, well that’s just ridiculous. Fangio and Kubiak had an extended 1 on 1 meeting yesterday and Fangio met with Elway after. My guess is Fangio let Elway know he wasn’t on board with Kubiak as OC. Makes sense, no one wants to have someone on their staff capable of wielding more power than them from a lesser position, like OC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 39 minutes ago, champ11 said: Signs are pointing to us getting our 1st round QB this year...which I don't love #4 is a sweet spot to trade up to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elwayfan07 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 Just a thought, if we are specifically looking for HC experience, what about Jim Caldwell. Granted others may have more innovative minds but if we want to look for that 2nd HC to help Fangio he could be an option Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elwayfan07 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 Quote The #Broncos will interview #49ers QB coach Rich Scangarello for their offensive coordinator job Monday, source said. A key assistant for Kyle Shanahan since their days in Atlanta, Scangarello had a big hand getting Nick Mullens ready to roll this season. An intriguing option.- Tom Pelissero Don't know too much about him but interesting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebestever6 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 1 hour ago, AnAngryAmerican said: What I don’t get is if Elway wanted the young hot shot with the new/college offense why not interview more than just Brian Taylor? Talk about dysfunction. Yikes. Well you said it earlier ellis wasn't comfortable with that model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul-mac Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 4 minutes ago, elwayfan07 said: Don't know too much about him but interesting The thing with this guy is that if he does well in the role, you probably either need to promote him or lose him when someone else makes him HC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elwayfan07 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, paul-mac said: The thing with this guy is that if he does well in the role, you probably either need to promote him or lose him when someone else makes him HC. True, but I suppose you can say that about any young innovative mind. But if we want to modernize the offense its a risk we have to take Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broncofan48 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, paul-mac said: The thing with this guy is that if he does well in the role, you probably either need to promote him or lose him when someone else makes him HC. So again I ask: We shouldn’t hire a young offensive mind to be OC because we are worried he will get promoted to someone else’s HC? I’m sorry but that makes 0 sense to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe_is_the_best Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 Obviously this kind of news is not indicative of a functional FO, but would Elway keeping Kubes over Fangio's objection be preferable? Heck no. I have to laugh at the idea that Fangio wont be a good gametime coach because he coaches defense. Really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.