Jump to content

🦅🤠 NFC East 🤷‍♂️🆘 | Celebrating the Cowboys' 28 Years of Sadness


Phire

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, NoFlyZone said:

That has little to do with the Vikings choking away their playoff existence and then Philly playing a completely handicapped 49ers game in a conference championship game. Not crying.. again, just talking facts here. 

There’s just some odd national rhetoric that refuses to give credit to or acknowledge that our DL was the reason these QBs got wasted. 70 sacks on the season, this is what we do. If these OCs didn’t get the memo that we get after the QB and not protecting or calling plays to avoid that, then you’re not doing your job properly. It’s not like these guys got hurt tripping off the plane. They got knocked out because our DL dominated. The 9ers came in thinking they didn’t have to change their game plan to beat us. They were wrong. What we do best is better than what they do best. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, NoFlyZone said:

That has little to do with the Vikings choking away their playoff existence and then Philly playing a completely handicapped 49ers game in a conference championship game. Not crying.. again, just talking facts here. 

Win more games and it doesn’t matter. Just talking facts here 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Eagles play the Giants after they embarrassed the 13-4 Vikings and the excuses start because a week later, those same Giants get embarrassed by us!  Dallas embarrasses a horrific 8-9 TB Bucs team, instantly believe the same will occur the following week vs the #1 Defense in the NFL.

That Dak led Cowboys team put up a whopping 12pts vs SF Defense. Eagles put up 31. Hell almost twice as many pts in the first 1/2 alone (21).

Let it go!

Edited by Nabbs4u
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Nabbs4u said:

 

Eagles play the Giants after they embarrassed the 13-4 Vikings and the excuses start because a week later, those same Giants get embarrassed by us!  Dallas embarrasses a horrific 8-9 TB Bucs team, instantly believe the same will occur the following week vs the #1 Defense in the NFL.

That Dak led Cowboys team put up a whopping 12pts vs SF Defense. Eagles put up 31. Hell almost twice as many pts in the first 1/2 alone (21).

Let it go!

The idea that you think your team was playing the same team that beat Dallas is impressively delusional. When a defense is on the field at all times with an absolutely imploding situation on offense where they can’t even field a healthy 4th string QB of course they’re going to give up more points. 

And the fact that you think people were portraying the Giants as anything other than slightly better than mediocre is laughable. The Vikings were absolutely clowned for losing to them. 
 

And no one here was saying the Dallas offense would turn around and embarrass the best defense in the NFL after whey they did to the Bucs. Seriously, no one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jroc04 said:

There’s just some odd national rhetoric that refuses to give credit to or acknowledge that our DL was the reason these QBs got wasted. 70 sacks on the season, this is what we do. If these OCs didn’t get the memo that we get after the QB and not protecting or calling plays to avoid that, then you’re not doing your job properly. It’s not like these guys got hurt tripping off the plane. They got knocked out because our DL dominated. The 9ers came in thinking they didn’t have to change their game plan to beat us. They were wrong. What we do best is better than what they do best. 

There is such a thing as QBs getting hit and pressured without getting immediately knocked out of the competition with an extremely unfortunate injury. The 49ers QB situation was laughably unfortunate regardless of your team’s ability to rush the passer.. and that’s clear to most people. Nothing odd about it. 
How many other games did Philly play where their opponent literally had no option left at QB? Clearly the situation was unprecedented. 

Edited by NoFlyZone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, NoFlyZone said:

There is such a thing as QBs getting hit and pressured without getting immediately knocked out of the competition with an extremely unfortunate injury. The 49ers QB situation was laughably unfortunate regardless of your team’s ability to rush the passer.. and that’s clear to most people. Nothing odd about it. 
How many other games did Philly play where their opponent literally had no option left at QB? Clearly the situation was unprecedented. 

Point is, the pass rush is a problem, was a problem. Just like any old swinging **** can tell me things would have been different if Purdy stayed in, I can counter with Purdy would have thrown 3 picks under that pressure all game long. It’s a silly argument. We know the Eagles get after the QB, the 9ers didn’t do much to prevent that. Who’s to say the brilliant Shanahan wouldn’t have just crumbled under his own stubbornness still? Like I said, it’s a silly what if. We can play this game all day. Im sure the game would have been more competitive with competent QB play but that’s nothing that can be definitively answered so what’s the bellyaching for? Let’s move on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jroc04 said:

Im sure the game would have been more competitive with competent QB play but that’s nothing that can be definitively answered so what’s the bellyaching for

Eagles would have won either way, but at least the 9ers being able to throw the ball down the field changes the game some.  We essentially played against a 100 year old college offense in the second half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, downundermike1 said:

Eagles would have won either way, but at least the 9ers being able to throw the ball down the field changes the game some.  We essentially played against a 100 year old college offense in the second half.

No doubt but the what if’s and excuses are for sore losers and people with agendas. Keeping Purdy in, without injury, could have been an absolute nightmare for them. Who’s to say? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jroc04 said:

No doubt but the what if’s and excuses are for sore losers and people with agendas. Keeping Purdy in, without injury, could have been an absolute nightmare for them. Who’s to say? 

I think Purdy would have settled down, and Shanahan hopefully would have adjusted his protection, but hard to tell, as good of a coach as he is, he does seem to melt down on gameday the bigger the stakes are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...