MightyMouse07 Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 10 hours ago, Forge said: Not to mention any offensive penalty results in a ten second run off, right? If it happens during the play, you're screwed and it's game over. Or is that just on a false start? Only on a running clock which it wasn’t. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET80 Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 No. They should have played defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 No I think they did the right thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theJ Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 I don't think it was worth the risk. They're running somewhere between 2-4 guys into the endzone, against a coverage that had 8 guys in the endzone. Not good odds. They would have done it with 11 seconds or maybe even 8-9 seconds had it been their first shot at it. But they tried it once at 16 seconds, saw how impossible it was going to be, and did the right thing. Now...had they known what was about to happen in OT, they probably would have taken two more shots and let time expire without kicking a FG. But you can't do that, because you don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 No. They should have gotten one of 3 stops on 3rd and 9+ or not had Dee Ford cost them the season with an offsides penalty that nullified the Super Bowl appearance INT when they were up 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter2_1 Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 wrong thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areksoo Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 11 hours ago, Skins212689 said: The defense the Patriots were in the only pass thats was gonna get completed was a pass across rhe middle. So now you have to asked, did the Chiefs have a Timeout to call once the ball is caught in bounds? I don't know if they did or didn't, but I know Belichick definitely made sure what happened to his defense with Gronk in a previous game didn't happen this game. KC had no timeouts left. Although they got a freebie timeout with the penalty at 16 seconds. Had there been no penalty, they would have spiked the ball with around 5-8 seconds left and kicked the field goal. They took one shot, didn't work so they made the correct call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakuvious Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 Nah, I think they played it right. They took one shot at 16 seconds to see the kind of D New England was coming out with. Didn't like it, threw it away, kicked it to OT. I was fine with the call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.