Dome Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 1) I know Payton has pushed for this the last couple years trying to get this changed. He just got a lot of leverage. Does he have enough? Should a pass interference call, or lack of PI call, be something a coach can challenge? 2) What would the process be for changing this? Can they change it or do they need to wait for the CBA to expire? 3) Would you like to see them change any other part of the challenge rules? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goldfishwars Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 No, but I do think it makes sense for a dude in a review booth to gets refs to take a review where a flagrant example is overlooked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destructo Spin Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 They used to review PI, back in the 90s before they abolished video review. I don't see why not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dome Posted January 21, 2019 Author Share Posted January 21, 2019 8 minutes ago, goldfishwars said: No, but I do think it makes sense for a dude in a review booth to gets refs to take a review where a flagrant example is overlooked. I’d be happy with that too, I’d rather they put it in the teams hands though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dome Posted January 21, 2019 Author Share Posted January 21, 2019 @goldfishwars how do you define “flagrant” for that example? What is the league looking for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
August4th Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 I think so..also challenge offsides and false starts too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goldfishwars Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 58 minutes ago, Dome said: @goldfishwars how do you define “flagrant” for that example? What is the league looking for? If it's clear from replays there is evidence contradicting on-field decisions then it's flagged to the officiating staff. They're replayed in the stadium anyway, seems silly for those officials not to have an opportunity to change their mind in a way that takes it out of their hands. I'm really only thinking of obvious cases like in last night's game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NVRamsFan Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 Can we also review face mask penalties that are missed? Or delay of games that are missed? PI isn't the only game changing call made or missed so where do we stop? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WindyCity Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 They do in the CFL. It is a challengeable play. I do not think it kills the flow of the game, but sometimes they are pretty ticky tack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TecmoSuperJoe Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, NVRamsFan said: Can we also review face mask penalties that are missed? Or delay of games that are missed? PI isn't the only game changing call made or missed so where do we stop? Maybe the ability to challenge one penalty per game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter2_1 Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 Well, everyone seems to think the refs are brutal - so why not take power away from them and put it into more technology? Or, give them even more help by having someone in a booth alert them when a massive error has occurred? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kramxel Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 PI is very subjective. Holding is almost as bad. You've got to stop somewhere to prevent going into some very mudy waters, that will only create a greater sense of injustice, for those not getting the calls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LETSGOBROWNIES Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 Yeah, anything should be reviewable if it means getting more stuff right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bomont Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 Of course it should be able to be challenged, it's ridiculous that it isn't. But ridiculous has described the NFL for a long time now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areksoo Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 Look at how ridiculous reviewing a catch became. That is less subjective than PI. If anything gets added to reviews, I would say Delay of Game. Out of all the things to add to review, that should be the most cut and dry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.