Dome Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 Just now, Malfatron said: okay, im watching it again I'll send you a bill. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y*so*blu Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 Drinking game. Take a shot every time the color commentator mentions "putting your foot in the ground." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dome Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 1 minute ago, y*so*blu said: Drinking game. Take a shot every time the color commentator mentions "putting your foot in the ground." Or the play by play says "good point" you'll be trashed in no time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y*so*blu Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 Guys, you're down at least two scores with less than six minutes left. You might want to throw the ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y*so*blu Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 The Stallions just gave up. They were making a fight of it for most of the game, even with their backup QB, but their defense and their o-line let them down. Interesting. First ever female wide receivers coach in a men's pro league? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackstar12 Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 Trent Richardson haven’t heard that name in ages lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMountainGoat Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 (edited) 10 hours ago, BayRaider said: They are not gonna aim to be a development league and hire a bunch of 70 year old coaches. Plus the logos and team names for the AAF are all absolutely dreadful. Expecting XFLs logos and names to be very good just like last time. McMahon will be focused on less crazy antics this time and more on football. AAF does have a head start on talent though. The XFL will fail unless it pitches itself as a developmental league. If it tries to compete with the NFL it will lose. There aren't good enough players to compete and any popular ideas it comes up with, the NFL will copy. The AAF might survive because it isn't competing with the NFL, it has a role alongside it Edited February 11, 2019 by BigMountainGoat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwibrown Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 The team names are awful. Warriors, Centurions, Crusaders, Storm, Rebels, Bulls, War, Tigers, Wolves, Badgers, Battle, the Pack, wolf Pack, are better than mot of the crap they came out with. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMountainGoat Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 28 minutes ago, Kiwibrown said: The team names are awful. Warriors, Centurions, Crusaders, Storm, Rebels, Bulls, War, Tigers, Wolves, Badgers, Battle, the Pack, wolf Pack, are better than mot of the crap they came out with. They really aren't. Thats a long list of cliche names 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwibrown Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 22 minutes ago, BigMountainGoat said: They really aren't. Thats a long list of cliche names do better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas5737 Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 19 minutes ago, Kiwibrown said: do better. Runners, Catchers, Sackers, Tacklers, Coverers, Rushers, Interceptors, Winners, Champions. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMountainGoat Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 (edited) 33 minutes ago, Kiwibrown said: do better. Why? Last time I checked I wasn't employed to name franchises The AAF names aren't great, but at least there is a bit of originality with some of them. Edited February 11, 2019 by BigMountainGoat 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwibrown Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 40 minutes ago, BigMountainGoat said: Why? Last time I checked I wasn't employed to name franchises The AAF names aren't great, but at least there is a bit of originality with some of them. I said. Seriously though, there ones were dog ****. I gave a generic list that was better than their list. The only one I like is Brigham Iron, the rest are meh, like the fleet, terrible, football names should be strong or intimidating at least. Lions, bears, Vikings, eagles, rams are all bad tough, the fleet, and the apollos are soft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwibrown Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 46 minutes ago, Thomas5737 said: Runners, Catchers, Sackers, Tacklers, Coverers, Rushers, Interceptors, Winners, Champions. 3rd down efficient, go for it on 4th down, high completion %, high dvoa, team analytics, are less cliche. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMountainGoat Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 3 minutes ago, Kiwibrown said: should be strong or intimidating at least. So what do you propose changing the Miami Dolphins name to? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.