Jump to content
.Buzz

Updated: Jaguars sign Nick Foles

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, DuvalsKing said:

I don’t expect Yannick, Jack, or Ramsey to be paid until after this season because if they don’t make the playoffs. If the barely miss at 9-7 it may change things in favor of Marrone but if it looks a lot like last year it’s done. This team will look drastically different in 2020.

only guys i want back from that trio are ngakoue and Ramsey. Jack is replaceable tho i would like to see him at WLB cuz at MLB he doesnt seem to diagnose as well. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Tugboat said:

Our defense isn't going to be "mostly intact" after 2019 though.  And when it comes to the 2019 season, i may not be a bigtime Foles booster...but i have a lot more confidence in him giving us even enough play to let the surrounding cast carry us to the playoffs, than a rookie QB coming off 1 year of starting in an Urban Meyer offense.

Long-term, sure...no question, it's not even a fair comparison.  But this defense is going to get blowed the heck up in a year, or two at most.  It's pretty much unavoidable...in 2020-21, they're going to have to do some absolutely massive retooling to this defense as guys age/price themselves out.

i trust haskins to be better both long and short term.  dude balled out regardless of the scheme and hell id probably take kyler murray and his shortness over foles.  murray at worse can give us a better passing Lamar Jackson and at best gives us a more mobile wilson. 

defensively i agree and if we have to blow it apart we need to trade the real talent like ramsey and the such for picks and such to help the rebuild.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This worries me more than most Titans fans. You guys likely beat us week 3 of last year with Foles instead of Blake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, dtait93 said:

This worries me more than most Titans fans. You guys likely beat us week 3 of last year with Foles instead of Blake.

That was a miserable game.

Foles will be better than Blake. They have to continue to surround Foles though. They still need a RB, TE, WR, RG, RT.

If they used the whole draft on offense I wouldn’t be surprised. They have to get more balanced.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, KhanYouDigIt said:

That was a miserable game.

Foles will be better than Blake. They have to continue to surround Foles though. They still need a RB, TE, WR, RG, RT.

If they used the whole draft on offense I wouldn’t be surprised. They have to get more balanced.

A great o-line fixes a lot. Give Foles time and he’ll do damage. Defilippo should know how to use him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, dtait93 said:

A great o-line fixes a lot. Give Foles time and he’ll do damage. Defilippo should know how to use him

He should but I’m still curious how well he knows him and how much of his success was Pederson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Get Tate, draft Taylor/Hockensen and load up on offense the rest of the draft. Profit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, .Buzz said:

Get Tate, draft Taylor/Hockensen and load up on offense the rest of the draft. Profit.

This team isn’t going to do anything else in free agency.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, DuvalsKing said:

This team isn’t going to do anything else in free agency.

We still have decent cap space to work with, thanks to releasing Gip in addition to Malik.  What they actually do with it...who knows.

 

Last year they sat on cap space instead of actually fixing problems and shoring up depth.  Wouldn't surprise me if they did the same again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Tugboat said:

We still have decent cap space to work with, thanks to releasing Gip in addition to Malik.  What they actually do with it...who knows.

 

Last year they sat on cap space instead of actually fixing problems and shoring up depth.  Wouldn't surprise me if they did the same again.

With the year we had and paying a pretty penny for an FA QB with basically no TE and little weapons on the roster...I'd be surprised.

I think Tate gets done and that's about it though FA wise besides depth pieces.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, JaguarCrazy2832 said:

Sad thing is Tate probably would be our best WR

Not into paying Tate near what he got. Sucks because he would've helped but...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×