Jump to content
Humble_Beast

2019 Raider Depth Chart Thread

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, big_palooka said:

Gruden alluded to keeping 3 QBs last night. Also said 5 URFA could make this team.

I don't think you can leave Rush or Doss off this roster. Ingold offers more than Smith from what I've seen

 

Guessing those 5 will be: Keelan Doss, Anthony Rush, AJ Cole, Alec Ingold, and Keisean Nixon. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Silver&Black88 said:

+1 to all of this. I’ll add that Jelly’s money will all be dead cap this and next year so we may as well rip off the bandaid if we think Rush can give us most of what Ellis does 

I like Jelly Ellis but he's replaceable. He has never been a dominant player here and never will be. Rush looks to have a lot more juice and can replace his production/impact. Besides, Hankins/Hurst should be the starters and Hall/Rush/Westbroooks (who've all flashed a lot in the preseason) is solid depth behind them. 

Edited by NYRaider

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Keisean Nixon is likely going to make the team. He has made a ton of plays in coverage during the preseason and was an elite gunner at South Carolina. Should be some decent depth at CB and an excellent STer. 

Really have to wonder how the CB/S depth shakes out. Right now I'm assuming,

CB: Conley, Worley, Mullens, Nixon, Johnson? (Stash on the IR)

S: Abram, Joseph, Harris, Joyner, Riley 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Love how versatile our DB's could potentially be. Conley/Worley/Mullens on the perimeter with Joyner in the slot and Abram/Harris/Joseph/Riley all rotating in at safety and moving around the field. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No love for my guy Pierson-el. Still rather him than Harris for his actual receiving ability.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, roi34 said:

No love for my guy Pierson-el. Still rather him than Harris for his actual receiving ability.

Can pierson be on punt coverage or kick coverage??? Harris is gonna be our 6th wr. I rather have our 6th wr be able to do other things also. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, roi34 said:

No love for my guy Pierson-el. Still rather him than Harris for his actual receiving ability.

he's been good. he has good moves and quickness, kinda lacking in overall speed. I think Harris shouldn't be a lock, but he is likely a lock

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nixon looks like a decent corner. No point cutting him, seeing as there's such a corner shortage in the league. I'd like to keep him Johnson Conley Worley and Mullen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, dante9876 said:

Can pierson be on punt coverage or kick coverage??? Harris is gonna be our 6th wr. I rather have our 6th wr be able to do other things also. 

I'm sure he can. I think he offers a little more than Harris at this point. But that's my opinion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Humble_Beast said:

he's been good. he has good moves and quickness, kinda lacking in overall speed. I think Harris shouldn't be a lock, but he is likely a lock

Agreed but Harris isn't exactly a burner either. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, MrOaktown_56 said:

Nixon looks like a decent corner. No point cutting him, seeing as there's such a corner shortage in the league. I'd like to keep him Johnson Conley Worley and Mullen.

He's a solid gunner too. There are worse positions to carry more players than you'd like. I hope we don't keep too many TEs. I also don't like sending Martin to IR but whatever

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, RaidersAreOne said:

As he should be. Nick Nelson is gonzo.

As he should be. Man, that guy did not turn out as they hoped.

 

Also, I might be overthinking it, but I'm not sure Conley will be in our long term plans. I could see him being moved somewhere down the line (as in next year or later)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×