Jump to content

Landon Collins to Washington


MikeT14

Recommended Posts

In Chicago thread we have been talking about Amos forever and (hopefully) not over paying him.

Collins is a fine football player, but box safeties are not a rare skill set.

Like running backs now who aren't also hybrid receivers.  They can be very good players, but they are much more easily replaced than other positions because of supply and demand.

QBs, Edge Rushers, Corners, ball hawking safeties are ones who are hard to find.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Woz said:

Because the price to keep them >> the value they offer to the team.

If you have a good-but-not-great edge rusher that you will have to sign for $12M AAV, or you can let someone else do that and give you a draft pick so you can go get the same guy on a rookie deal and four years younger, why wouldn't you do this?

This is how New England and Baltimore have been good for so long: they evaluate their players and decide if they're worth keeping or not.

New England has been good because of Tom Brady. It’s easy to let everyone walk when you have the greatest player ever at the most important position on the field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Thaiphoon said:

Same. For me it's just the $$ that is killing me right now. He better be worth every penny.

The part that really gets me is the $45M guaranteed. 

The team that’s currently stuck holding a $70M bag because its giant QB contract went belly up due to injury is now right back in there giving another monster guarantee? 

He’s effectively uncuttable until AT LEAST year 5 of this deal. And even then it’s a huge pill to swallow. At least with Smith, maybe you take the gamble because he’s a QB and the reward is so huge for great QB play (and they rarely get seriously hurt anymore). But with a strong safety? Yikes...

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, dll2000 said:

In Chicago thread we have been talking about Amos forever and (hopefully) not over paying him.

Collins is a fine football player, but box safeties are not a rare skill set.

Like running backs now who aren't also hybrid receivers.  They can be very good players, but they are much more easily replaced than other positions because of supply and demand.

QBs, Edge Rushers, Corners, ball hawking safeties are ones who are hard to find.

 

Maybe it’s easier for other teams but we haven’t been able to replace a safety that died 12 years ago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, lavar703 said:

New England has been good because of Tom Brady. It’s easy to let everyone walk when you have the greatest player ever at the most important position on the field. 

Yes, but by re-stocking your draft classes with extra picks, you gain the ability to pay a future Hall of Famer whatever he wants without destroying your salary cap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, e16bball said:

He’s effectively uncuttable until AT LEAST year 5 of this deal. And even then it’s a huge pill to swallow. At least with Smith, maybe you take the gamble because he’s a QB and the reward is so huge for great QB play (and they rarely get seriously hurt anymore). But with a strong safety? Yikes...

Maybe year 3, given the rumors that it is front loaded, but still ... why? Especially when you have someone like Scherff you want to conceivably keep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Woz said:

Maybe year 3, given the rumors that it is front loaded, but still ... why? Especially when you have someone like Scherff you want to conceivably keep.

I'm gonna have "fun" playing with the #'s on sportrac after this FA period is over in seeing how I can keep Scherff on the roster. My guess is that we'll have to cut/trade quite a few players now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...