Jump to content

2019 Free Agency V2


SBXISBXVSBXVIII

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, RaidersAreOne said:

 

I was thinking we were lacking bodies after Crowell went down, and Warren flopped. Gillislee probably have a tough road climb but our top 3 RBs (Jacobs, Richard, Martin) shouldn't get much run in the preseason. Maybe Gillislee has fresh legs, Butler is another midget back. We need someone to run the ball these 4 games, and he could surprise. Also very hard to predict an injury. Theo Reddick, Chris Ivory, De'anthony Thomas, Jeremy Hill, Gillislee could all be cheap Rbs to take a look at

Edited by Humble_Beast
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gillislee was a pretty good player a few years back, with Jacobs, Martin and Richard as virtual locks though it'll be tough to make the roster. I can see us carrying 4 RBs however,  Martin is up there in age for a RB and Jacobs has never had the workload he's scheduled to have so it may make sense to have another guy in there just in case. Surprised we haven't taken a look at a guy like Ajayi as he's still pretty young........I guess he wants the chance to be a starting back somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Darbsk said:

Gillislee was a pretty good player a few years back, with Jacobs, Martin and Richard as virtual locks though it'll be tough to make the roster. I can see us carrying 4 RBs however,  Martin is up there in age for a RB and Jacobs has never had the workload he's scheduled to have so it may make sense to have another guy in there just in case. Surprised we haven't taken a look at a guy like Ajayi as he's still pretty young........I guess he wants the chance to be a starting back somewhere.

If we're going to carry 4 backs I am pretty confident the 4th back will be DeAndre Washington. Gruden seems to prefer smaller guys that can catch the ball out of the backfield. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, NYRaider said:

If we're going to carry 4 backs I am pretty confident the 4th back will be DeAndre Washington. Gruden seems to prefer smaller guys that can catch the ball out of the backfield. 

Totally forgot about Washington :$

Really liked him coming out in the draft and though he's not really shone maybe this pre-season is his time to stake a claim for more playing time. Tough for him though with Richard effectively doing a very similar job and being slightly more explosive.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Darbsk said:

Totally forgot about Washington :$

Really liked him coming out in the draft and though he's not really shone maybe this pre-season is his time to stake a claim for more playing time. Tough for him though with Richard effectively doing a very similar job and being slightly more explosive.

 

Richard made him obsolete their rookie year.  I've been confused as to why he has stuck around for the last couple of years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, true2form said:

Richard made him obsolete their rookie year.  I've been confused as to why he has stuck around for the last couple of years.

Washington is they type guy who could go to the Pats and have a big role. He's talented, just doesn't get a lot of opportunity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, big_palooka said:

Washington is they type guy who could go to the Pats and have a big role. He's talented, just doesn't get a lot of opportunity.

There was a lot of chatter that we might try to trade him during the draft for a pick. He's a nice insurance policy to have as a 4th RB and IIRC he's also a pretty good special teams player. It's pretty clear that Gruden wants RB's that can catch the ball. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, NYRaider said:

There was a lot of chatter that we might try to trade him during the draft for a pick. He's a nice insurance policy to have as a 4th RB and IIRC he's also a pretty good special teams player. It's pretty clear that Gruden wants RB's that can catch the ball. 

Washington isn't a great passing catching back. Washington is a fringe NFL RB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Humble_Beast said:

Washington isn't a great passing catching back. Washington is a fringe NFL RB

He didn't play much last season but he had 51 catches during his first two seasons in the NFL. He also had 124 catches for 1,100 yards in college. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NYRaider said:

He didn't play much last season but he had 51 catches during his first two seasons in the NFL. He also had 124 catches for 1,100 yards in college. 

I just remember that game he had a chance to prove himself against the Bills, he was terrible. kept fumbling, Richard has his problems but at least he is more explosive in the passing game. Eagles have like 7 RBs better lol, would be smart to sign one after preseason 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Humble_Beast said:

I just remember that game he had a chance to prove himself against the Bills, he was terrible. kept fumbling, Richard has his problems but at least he is more explosive in the passing game. Eagles have like 7 RBs better lol, would be smart to sign one after preseason 

We already have Jacobs, Martin, and Richard, do we really need another RB? Washington is a nice insurance policy to have. He knows the system and has a similar skill-set to our top 3 backs so we don't have to change much if he's playing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, NYRaider said:

We already have Jacobs, Martin, and Richard, do we really need another RB? Washington is a nice insurance policy to have. He knows the system and has a similar skill-set to our top 3 backs so we don't have to change much if he's playing. 

yes, RBs drop like flies when they run hard and violent. Richard is more of a 3rd down back too, so be wise to keep 4 RBs. look at the Pats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...