AFF Posted March 27, 2019 Author Share Posted March 27, 2019 No Tombert at Iowa Pro day...scratch the TEs off day 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaRealTitletown Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 Damn it that sucks ^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warfelg Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 WR coach Drake on hand at ASU’s pro day with K’Neal Harry being the person of interest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chieferific Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 Oops Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chieferific Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 Double ooops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chieferific Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 6 hours ago, AlanFanecaFan said: No Tombert at Iowa Pro day...scratch the TEs off day 1. I actually think that's good news. Because, Bucky Hodges 😁. A better TE can be had day 2 or 3 then can Edge/CB. If many were fine with JJ it doesn't take a 1st Rdr to replace him. If many like Vance's skill set, that can too be had on day 2 or 3. I understand the love for these Iowa guys. I just feel like other positions (especially CB) are more important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
43M Posted March 28, 2019 Share Posted March 28, 2019 On 3/27/2019 at 12:45 PM, DaRealTitletown said: Damn it that sucks ^ Not to me. I'd vomit if we took a TE in the 1st round. Not even a top 5 need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cjfollett Posted March 28, 2019 Share Posted March 28, 2019 I think TE is a need, but 4th or 5th round at most. If they take one in the 1st, it is definitely a luxury pick. Sort of like taking Mendenhall and Sweed back in the day. CB, ILB, S in any order you like. Then, maybe TE or WR if no one is available for EDGE/OLB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFF Posted March 28, 2019 Author Share Posted March 28, 2019 A high TE pick probably plays more than any DB or Edge pick this year...James play 50% of snaps last year. ILB is debatable but that would probably take worthier picking Bush or White in rd1. No rookie starting over Haden and Nelson...slight chance of nickel back with them seeming to sour on Hilton late in year. Slight chance of FS over Davis but is there any S besides Chauncey(they didn’t go to his Pro day tho) that could unseat Davis this year. For year 1 impact, a TE has a solid chance of making the most impact...you guys are buts if you think TE isn’t a big need especially with Vance’s injury history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chieferific Posted March 28, 2019 Share Posted March 28, 2019 1 minute ago, AlanFanecaFan said: A high TE pick probably plays more than any DB or Edge pick this year...James play 50% of snaps last year. ILB is debatable but that would probably take worthier picking Bush or White in rd1. No rookie starting over Haden and Nelson...slight chance of nickel back with them seeming to sour on Hilton late in year. Slight chance of FS over Davis but is there any S besides Chauncey(they didn’t go to his Pro day tho) that could unseat Davis this year. For year 1 impact, a TE has a solid chance of making the most impact...you guys are buts if you think TE isn’t a big need especially with Vance’s injury history. TE isn't a Rd. 1 need. Get a JJ in Rd 5 or another Vance in Rd 3 or 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFF Posted March 28, 2019 Author Share Posted March 28, 2019 1 hour ago, Chieferific said: TE isn't a Rd. 1 need. Get a JJ in Rd 5 or another Vance in Rd 3 or 4. I didn’t say it was the biggest need but overall it’s a upper tier need. Getting locked into needs at certain spots creates Artie Burns situations. This team needs defensive help no doubt, however the offense is going to drive this team. The defense is gonna give up a decent amount of points regardless of who they pick this year. I think it’s more realistic that the Steelers win games 31-28 rather than 17-14. Its probably a moot point cause the lack of then going to Iowa’s Pro day, slight chance they go Irv Smith from Bama. Plus with Tomlin opening stating they’re going to add to the position, I think they realize it’s a decent sized need...I’m wagering they add one by end of rd3. Overall my thought is trying to have as many weapons for Ben. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chieferific Posted March 28, 2019 Share Posted March 28, 2019 17 minutes ago, AlanFanecaFan said: I didn’t say it was the biggest need but overall it’s a upper tier need. Getting locked into needs at certain spots creates Artie Burns situations. This team needs defensive help no doubt, however the offense is going to drive this team. The defense is gonna give up a decent amount of points regardless of who they pick this year. I think it’s more realistic that the Steelers win games 31-28 rather than 17-14. Its probably a moot point cause the lack of then going to Iowa’s Pro day, slight chance they go Irv Smith from Bama. Plus with Tomlin opening stating they’re going to add to the position, I think they realize it’s a decent sized need...I’m wagering they add one by end of rd3. Overall my thought is trying to have as many weapons for Ben. This sounds a little different then what I thought you were saying, I thought you took issue with those who said TE wasn't a 1st Rd need. I agree with this post. Sternberger (as you prolly know) is my guy. 2nd pick Rd 3 sounds about right for him. I think he's gone by Rd. 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcash4 Posted March 28, 2019 Share Posted March 28, 2019 Im pretty heavily against the general idea (not just team specific) of drafting a TE in the first round. But it is replacing nearly 600 snaps immediately. If that player can be a significant talent, its an immediate producer in terms of snap availability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFF Posted March 28, 2019 Author Share Posted March 28, 2019 29 minutes ago, Chieferific said: This sounds a little different then what I thought you were saying, I thought you took issue with those who said TE wasn't a 1st Rd need. I agree with this post. Sternberger (as you prolly know) is my guy. 2nd pick Rd 3 sounds about right for him. I think he's gone by Rd. 4. I’d be fine with in 2nd honestly...Colbert went to a lot of Pro Days for rd2-4 type TEs...Sternberger,Mack, Moreau, Mack from ND, Nauta from Georgia...plus they sent a guy to look at Dax Raymond from Utah St and they’ve sent Mark Bruener to SD st for Warring, Bruener ran him their TE workout. My $$$ right now is Moreau from LSU with one of their 3rds or Sternberger in the 2nd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jebrick Posted March 28, 2019 Share Posted March 28, 2019 Compiled by someone else but for your enjoyment: Quote Here's where Tombert has appeared so far: Clemson Michigan Bama ND WVU LSU A&M Texas Here are the underaged prospects at those schools: CB: Julian Love, Trayvon Mullen, Greedy Williams, Saivion Smith S: Deointe Thompson LB: Bush, White, Mack Wilson, David Long, Tyrel Dodson DL: Rashan Gary, Quinnen Williams, Dexter Lawrence, Charles Omenihu OL: Jonah Williams TE: Irv Smith WR: LJ Humphrey RB: Traveon Williams, Josh Jacobs Under TJ Watt "normal" age threshold: EDGE: Austin Bryant, Clelin Ferrell CB: Mark Fields LB: Te'Von Coney DL: Kingsley KeKe, Bert Huggins, Daylon Mack OL: Erik McCoy, Mitchell Hyatt TE: Foster Moreau, Alize' Mack WR: Miles Boykin, Gary Jennings RB: Dexter Williams, Damien Harris Unless Tombert makes an appearance at Washington or USC or Stanford, or unless they deviate from their habits... the 1st round pick and possibly 2nd/3rd round picks are on that list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.