.Buzz Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 Great signing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted March 16, 2019 Author Share Posted March 16, 2019 Conley said this a few days ago on Twitter: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted March 16, 2019 Author Share Posted March 16, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinderFournette Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 i wanna see the numbers but i feel hes a worthwhile gamble. hes got the size and the athleticism for the position Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted March 17, 2019 Share Posted March 17, 2019 3 hours ago, LinderFournette said: i wanna see the numbers but i feel hes a worthwhile gamble. hes got the size and the athleticism for the position Yea we have alot of the same size WRs. Glad someone that is taller than 6 is here again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuvalsKing Posted March 17, 2019 Share Posted March 17, 2019 22 minutes ago, JaguarCrazy2832 said: Yea we have alot of the same size WRs. Glad someone that is taller than 6 is here again But Chark is taller than 6’ 🤨 and so was Moncrief last yr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speedyg Posted March 17, 2019 Share Posted March 17, 2019 Not sure where this narrative is that we don't have any tall receivers. We do. We just don't have "big" physical guys (like Arob or alshon). Chark is 6'4, Cole is 6'1, Dede and Lee are 6"0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted March 17, 2019 Share Posted March 17, 2019 I was wrong about Chark but i wouldnt call the others big Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tugboat Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 Depends on the exact numbers i guess, but i actually really like this signing. He's exactly the sort of target that was most glaringly missing from our WR corps in that "big body possession guy" type. And it at least potentially shows that this staff are aware of just how important that type is going to be to Foles success/failure here. Plus, as a bonus...it's a guy who should already have a jumpstart on rapport with Foles from their previous time together. That could be big in helping Foles settle in with a security blankie early while parachuting into a new situation with big expectations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted March 20, 2019 Author Share Posted March 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tugboat said: Depends on the exact numbers i guess, but i actually really like this signing. He's exactly the sort of target that was most glaringly missing from our WR corps in that "big body possession guy" type. And it at least potentially shows that this staff are aware of just how important that type is going to be to Foles success/failure here. Plus, as a bonus...it's a guy who should already have a jumpstart on rapport with Foles from their previous time together. That could be big in helping Foles settle in with a security blankie early while parachuting into a new situation with big expectations. 1) 1.8M 2) He said he signed here mostly because of Nick. They seem to have a great relationship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tugboat Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 2 hours ago, .Buzz said: 1) 1.8M 2) He said he signed here mostly because of Nick. They seem to have a great relationship. That's a good number, and an encouraging seed of chemistry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted March 26, 2019 Author Share Posted March 26, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 20 hours ago, .Buzz said: Lets hope he’s talking this year and not when Conley leaves next year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.