Leader Posted March 17, 2019 Share Posted March 17, 2019 4 minutes ago, Outpost31 said: Also, with Haskins still available, there's no player in the draft that would provide as much value as trading down. We could definitely get a big haul there. Even from the Dolphins to keep other teams from trading up. We could milk that pick for a whole whole whole lot. Not disagreeing with you, but Miami's kinda tight on draft pick wiggly room IMO. Not an astounding spread.... Total picks: 7. » Round 1: No. 13 overall » Round 2: No. 48 » Round 3: No. 78 » Round 4: No. 116 » Round 5: No. 151 » Round 7: Nos. 233 (from Titans), 234 (from Steelers through Browns) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Fussnputz Posted March 17, 2019 Share Posted March 17, 2019 With Kevin King's injury history and Breeland unsigned, I'd go with Greedy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasDan Posted March 17, 2019 Share Posted March 17, 2019 Jonah Williams. Jonah be taking over for the whale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted March 17, 2019 Share Posted March 17, 2019 Like someone said, with Haskins still available someone would be willing to trade up. I'm willing to bet that the Giants (assuming they don't take a QB at 6) or Raiders would trade up for Haskins. Question is, would we want to trade back to 24? If we don't trade back, I'd be inclined to take Jeffery Simmons (best player available even despite the ACL tear) or Jerry Tillery (the chance upside pick). Jonah Williams would get some serious play there too. Hell, I'd even consider taking Haskins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted March 17, 2019 Share Posted March 17, 2019 3 minutes ago, beekay414 said: Like someone said, with Haskins still available someone would be willing to trade up. I'm willing to bet that the Giants (assuming they don't take a QB at 6) or Raiders would trade up for Haskins. Question is, would we want to trade back to 24? If we don't trade back, I'd be inclined to take Jeffery Simmons (best player available even despite the ACL tear) or Jerry Tillery (the chance upside pick). Jonah Williams would get some serious play there too. Hell, I'd even consider taking Haskins. You would hope that GB would be able to find a trade partner to move down a few slots in hoping that someone would want to move up for either a QB or maybe Jonah Williams. It is a less than ideal situation for sure. Denver at 10 and Cincy at 11 are both options to take a QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted March 17, 2019 Share Posted March 17, 2019 Just now, squire12 said: You would hope that GB would be able to find a trade partner to move down a few slots in hoping that someone would want to move up for either a QB or maybe Jonah Williams. It is a less than ideal situation for sure. Denver at 10 and Cincy at 11 are both options to take a QB. Giants at 17 would be ideal. Maybe gain a 2020 2nd to do it? You'd still have a shot at Simmons and Tillery there. Not sure how I feel about Greedy Williams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted March 17, 2019 Share Posted March 17, 2019 Isn't an even worse case scenario if no QB is taken ahead of us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PossibleCabbage Posted March 17, 2019 Author Share Posted March 17, 2019 37 minutes ago, ThatJerkDave said: Isn't an even worse case scenario if no QB is taken ahead of us? I just figured "0 QBs in the top 11" was an entirely implausible scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 17, 2019 Share Posted March 17, 2019 3 hours ago, beekay414 said: Like someone said, with Haskins still available someone would be willing to trade up. I'm willing to bet that the Giants (assuming they don't take a QB at 6) or Raiders would trade up for Haskins. Question is, would we want to trade back to 24? If we don't trade back, I'd be inclined to take Jeffery Simmons (best player available even despite the ACL tear) or Jerry Tillery (the chance upside pick). Jonah Williams would get some serious play there too. Hell, I'd even consider taking Haskins. I don't think the Packers want to trade back that far. With how the board shakes up, you're probably comfortable moving into that 15-18 range. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazrimiv Posted March 17, 2019 Share Posted March 17, 2019 3 hours ago, Victor1124 said: Agree on Ferrell. He seems very concerned that his athletic testing will hurt his draft stock imo. Not to mention, he is very similar to both of the Smith's that we just signed. This is why I've kind of dropped off Ferrell in my thinking for #12. GB just spent a lot of money on two guys with similar traits, so I'm not really expecting Gute to be adding Ferrell at #12. Then again, if that's the kind of edge they want in this defense, I wouldn't complain too much about adding a third guy who can rotate in without much of a drop off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 17, 2019 Share Posted March 17, 2019 1 hour ago, PossibleCabbage said: I just figured "0 QBs in the top 11" was an entirely implausible scenario. There's a better chance of 3 QBs going in the top 11 than 0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 18, 2019 Share Posted March 18, 2019 Just now, Mazrimiv said: This is why I've kind of dropped off Ferrell in my thinking for #12. GB just spent a lot of money on two guys with similar traits, so I'm not really expecting Gute to be adding Ferrell at #12. Then again, if that's the kind of edge they want in this defense, I wouldn't complain too much about adding a third guy who can rotate in without much of a drop off. It'll be pretty clear if Pettine has a firm body type if they take Ferrell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 18, 2019 Share Posted March 18, 2019 25 minutes ago, CWood21 said: It'll be pretty clear if Pettine has a firm body type if they take Ferrell. I'd be disappointed if they did so unless both Burns and Sweat are gone. Seems like a waste to draft Ferrell, who's a redundancy to the Smiths versus complementing them with a speed guy, especially Burns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hsmc25 Posted March 18, 2019 Share Posted March 18, 2019 Adderley possible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 18, 2019 Share Posted March 18, 2019 17 minutes ago, hsmc25 said: Adderley possible? At 12? No. At 30? Possibly. Still not totally sure what Pettine wants in his safeties. Last year was not the best idea to make any concrete opinions on it IMO. What say you @AlexGreen#20? @rcon14? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.