Jump to content

Gronk Retires


goldfishwars

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Forge said:

They've always been hard on receivers and there is a back log. Maybe the voters don't vote his career as kindly as you do. Positions are not treated equally

Also Gronk dominated his competition, and won rings. Much easier road for the voters. 

Sterling has no rings, and wasn't the clear-cut best receiver in the NFL. When you have a short career, you basically need to have the perfect storm of circumstances to get in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the best football players I've seen. Probably the best TE ever, even if he didn't have the longevity of Gates and Gonzalez. 

A heck of a party guy, and one who you didn't doubt was one of the hardest workers.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Final statistics for Rob Gronkowski:

115 games, 522 catches for 7863 yards and 80 touchdowns.

He is 3rd all time in TDs for a TE with 80.

He is 7th all time in receiving yards, and 1st all time yards/game, for a TE.

He is 12th all time for receptions for a TE.

He also ranks 1st all time for play-off touchdowns, yards and receptions at his position (he is second, behind Jerry Rice, for postseason rec/TDs).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, TheKillerNacho said:

Can't really think of another player in he HOF with only four truly great seasons on his resume.

There probably is, but they probably don't deserve to be in it, either. Gronk isn't even a RB where that sort of thing is expected.

Think Harder. Gale Sayers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...