deathstar Posted April 1, 2019 Author Share Posted April 1, 2019 So I'm just evaluating my data here. Again: I took everyone with an RAS rating and averaged that with their average position on big boards. I then used that to rank players. Using this I just looked at the biggest differences in big board rankings and the rankings I've generated that favor players w/ high RAS. Here are some names that I'm going to be looking into as potential value picks later in the draft: Kano Dillon - TE Chris Westry - CB Jamal Custis - WR Andrew Van Ginckel - DE Porter Gustin - LB Again these are players who, based on their RAS, the Packers could value more than other organizations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcon14 Posted April 1, 2019 Share Posted April 1, 2019 1 minute ago, deathstar said: So I'm just evaluating my data here. Again: I took everyone with an RAS rating and averaged that with their average position on big boards. I then used that to rank players. Using this I just looked at the biggest differences in big board rankings and the rankings I've generated that favor players w/ high RAS. Here are some names that I'm going to be looking into as potential value picks later in the draft: Kano Dillon - TE Chris Westry - DT Jamal Custis - WR Andrew Van Ginckel - DE Porter Gustin - LB Again these are players who, based on their RAS, the Packers could value more than other organizations. Andrew Van Ginkel He's a good one. Was very good at UW his JR year and his SR year had a nagging ankle injury and UW's defense was much worse when he wasn't there. Waldo #s (percentile): Mass: 9th Power: 62nd Speed 40: 74th Agility: 76th Speed 10: 80th Twitch: 90th Big problem for them is that he is slight (6034, 241), but even factoring that in, he's quite athletic. Would certainly give us a different type of EDGE than those that we currently have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deathstar Posted April 1, 2019 Author Share Posted April 1, 2019 3 minutes ago, rcon14 said: Andrew Van Ginkel He's a good one. Was very good at UW his JR year and his SR year had a nagging ankle injury and UW's defense was much worse when he wasn't there. Waldo #s (percentile): Mass: 9th Power: 62nd Speed 40: 74th Agility: 76th Speed 10: 80th Twitch: 90th Big problem for them is that he is slight (6034, 241), but even factoring that in, he's quite athletic. Would certainly give us a different type of EDGE than those that we currently have. As a LB he's got some great traits as well. Given his size we could look at him as a player in the Oren Burks mold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcon14 Posted April 1, 2019 Share Posted April 1, 2019 1 minute ago, deathstar said: As a LB he's got some great traits as well. Given his size we could look at him as a player in the Oren Burks mold. It would certainly be a change from his role at UW, which was exclusively as an EDGE, but he did drop some and looked pretty good in coverage. Had 2 INTs his JR year, even. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted April 1, 2019 Share Posted April 1, 2019 13 minutes ago, rcon14 said: Andrew Van Ginkel He's a good one. Was very good at UW his JR year and his SR year had a nagging ankle injury and UW's defense was much worse when he wasn't there. Waldo #s (percentile): Mass: 9th Power: 62nd Speed 40: 74th Agility: 76th Speed 10: 80th Twitch: 90th Big problem for them is that he is slight (6034, 241), but even factoring that in, he's quite athletic. Would certainly give us a different type of EDGE than those that we currently have. Synopsis from TDN: BEST TRAIT – Lateral Mobility WORST TRAIT – Competitive Toughness BEST FILM – Ohio State (2017) WORST FILM – Western Kentucky (2018) RED FLAGS – None Andrew Van Ginkel is an uninspiring EDGE prospect, given his lack of pass rush skills and his lack of ability to set and anchor the edge against the run. A former JUCO prospect, he shows enough movement skills and ability in space to warrant consideration as a possible convert to the second level as an off ball linebacker. Van Ginkel projects as a practice squad candidate if teams wish to invest in his underneath zone coverage skills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcon14 Posted April 1, 2019 Share Posted April 1, 2019 Just now, Leader said: Synopsis from TDN: BEST TRAIT – Lateral Mobility WORST TRAIT – Competitive Toughness BEST FILM – Ohio State (2017) WORST FILM – Western Kentucky (2018) RED FLAGS – None Andrew Van Ginkel is an uninspiring EDGE prospect, given his lack of pass rush skills and his lack of ability to set and anchor the edge against the run. A former JUCO prospect, he shows enough movement skills and ability in space to warrant consideration as a possible convert to the second level as an off ball linebacker. Van Ginkel projects as a practice squad candidate if teams wish to invest in his underneath zone coverage skills. "Lack of pass rush skills" is something that gets attributed to every UW EDGE product because their OLB coach teaches almost exclusively the push/pull move. But yeah, he's definitely someone you're getting later day 3 and seeing what you can do with his movement skills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deathstar Posted April 1, 2019 Author Share Posted April 1, 2019 Jamal Custis - reminds me a lot of EQ and MVS. Van Ginkel - plays from a 2 point stance a lot and physically looks like Burks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dubz41 Posted April 1, 2019 Share Posted April 1, 2019 4 hours ago, rcon14 said: It would certainly be a change from his role at UW, which was exclusively as an EDGE, but he did drop some and looked pretty good in coverage. Had 2 INTs his JR year, even. AVG- get it? Ha, VanGinkel also is a playmaker. He might have been the best playmaker the Badgers have had the last two years. Would love to see him in the 6th or 7th round, Special teamer with room to develop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.