Hail Mary Posted April 26, 2019 Share Posted April 26, 2019 (edited) We are going to be scary in the pass rush this year. We look pretty good at DB too. If our WR core continues to improve we will be even more dangerous on both sides of the ball. Edited April 26, 2019 by Hail Mary Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mightybk Posted April 26, 2019 Share Posted April 26, 2019 Think about it this way: we traded our 4th rd pick and HHCD for an upgrade at HHCD's position. Sounds like a good trade to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighCalebR Posted April 26, 2019 Share Posted April 26, 2019 3 minutes ago, mightybk said: Think about it this way: we traded our 4th rd pick and HHCD for an upgrade at HHCD's position. Sounds like a good trade to me. I'm VERY optimistic too. But he is a rookie. Give him time to grow. Amos is more or less to replace HHCD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smetana34 Posted April 26, 2019 Share Posted April 26, 2019 40 minutes ago, Hail Mary said: So OT at 44 and 75? I hope not. The line is fine 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted April 26, 2019 Share Posted April 26, 2019 Rob Demovsky: Packers GM Brian Gutekunst said he moved up from 30 to 21 for several reasons: *It wasn't a deep safety group. *Darnell Savage was "an absolute difference maker." *Didn't think Savage would be there at 30. So - comparatively - Gute didnt think highly of the other FS - and given the only other one to go in the first round was Abrams (who I didnt want any part of cause he was Box Safety Redux......) - he very well may have been right. Regardless - I like the talent and the position filled with that talent. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgers0821 Posted April 26, 2019 Share Posted April 26, 2019 Still a little confused why we didn’t go OT somewhere in round 1 when they all started falling. When our offense is top 5 we have a good/great OL, right now our OL is subpar...and we missed the playoffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopackgonerd Posted April 26, 2019 Share Posted April 26, 2019 1 minute ago, badgers0821 said: Still a little confused why we didn’t go OT somewhere in round 1 when they all started falling. When our offense is top 5 we have a good/great OL, right now our OL is subpar...and we missed the playoffs. Can still draft one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted April 26, 2019 Share Posted April 26, 2019 1 minute ago, badgers0821 said: Still a little confused why we didn’t go OT somewhere in round 1 when they all started falling. When our offense is top 5 we have a good/great OL, right now our OL is subpar...and we missed the playoffs. How is our OL subpar? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted April 26, 2019 Share Posted April 26, 2019 Just now, beekay414 said: How is our OL subpar? Because he said so??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cpdaly23 Posted April 26, 2019 Share Posted April 26, 2019 1 minute ago, badgers0821 said: Still a little confused why we didn’t go OT somewhere in round 1 when they all started falling. When our offense is top 5 we have a good/great OL, right now our OL is subpar...and we missed the playoffs. Packers must feel that the Turner signing and Cole Madison showing up for mini camp gives them the depth fill starting RG and cover for any injuries. also, even though he hasn’t lived up to his draft status, Spriggs has improved and was playing decent football before he got hurt (again)... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted April 26, 2019 Share Posted April 26, 2019 Just now, beekay414 said: How is our OL subpar? I wondered the same thing... Bakhtiari-Taylor-Linsley-Turner-Bulaga That looks pretty good to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted April 26, 2019 Share Posted April 26, 2019 1 minute ago, ThatJerkDave said: I wondered the same thing... Bakhtiari-Taylor-Linsley-Turner-Bulaga That looks pretty good to me. Exactly. I get wanting a replacement for Bulaga long term but saying our OL is subpar is disingenuous. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgers0821 Posted April 26, 2019 Share Posted April 26, 2019 1 minute ago, beekay414 said: Exactly. I get wanting a replacement for Bulaga long term but saying our OL is subpar is disingenuous. Do Rodgers took all those sacks and had historical throwaway numbers because he sucks? Not because our OL was bad? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted April 26, 2019 Share Posted April 26, 2019 1 minute ago, badgers0821 said: Do Rodgers took all those sacks and had historical throwaway numbers because he sucks? Not because our OL was bad? He took those sacks and throw aways because he held on to the ball too long or didn't throw to/trust a perceived open receiver. Little of that had to do with our offensive line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted April 26, 2019 Share Posted April 26, 2019 1 minute ago, badgers0821 said: Do Rodgers took all those sacks and had historical throwaway numbers because he sucks? Not because our OL was bad? the short answer is: yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.