MacReady Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 Just now, ThatJerkDave said: ...wasn't a dig. You are just prolific. He's very sensitive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smetana34 Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 38 minutes ago, ThatJerkDave said: We have a pretty good 1-2 punch at RB. What is to be worried about? The fact that Jones has ended both his seasons on IR is a start Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dubz41 Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 9 hours ago, Ragnarok said: I've been thinking that LaFleur might intentionally not take a WR this year. There were stories that Rodgers went off on his rookie WRs. A couple had flashes, but they obviously need consistency. Not taking a WR would force Rodgers and his 3 2nd year WRs to figure **** out. There wouldn't be a rookie to distract from that goal. And LaFleur could use it as a way to send a message in a manner that doesn't embarrass Rodgers. This is convoluted and confusing. That's not how you open communication lines. Head games and manipulation? Not a plan to move forward with. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 1 minute ago, Dubz41 said: This is convoluted and confusing. That's not how you open communication lines. Head games and manipulation? Not a plan to move forward with. I was drunk. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jleisher Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 5 hours ago, ThatJerkDave said: ...wasn't a dig. You are just prolific. Sorry man! I just seem to get a lot of crap from some and I just assumed that you joined them. I guess I made an as_ out of myself. My apologizes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 Just now, jleisher said: Sorry man! I just seem to get a lot of crap from some and I just assumed that you joined them. I guess I made an as_ out of myself. My apologizes. I'm not mad. I was absolutely poking fun at you, but I meant no harm. You do so many mocks that you cover a ton of players. Saves me some research time on the left guard from Oregon State. Why would they need scouts when you already covered so many players? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted April 28, 2019 Author Share Posted April 28, 2019 On 4/27/2019 at 1:57 AM, Ragnarok said: I've been thinking that LaFleur might intentionally not take a WR this year. There were stories that Rodgers went off on his rookie WRs. A couple had flashes, but they obviously need consistency. Not taking a WR would force Rodgers and his 3 2nd year WRs to figure **** out. There wouldn't be a rookie to distract from that goal. And LaFleur could use it as a way to send a message in a manner that doesn't embarrass Rodgers. I think it has more to do with them being content with what they've currently got under contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaximusGluteus Posted April 29, 2019 Share Posted April 29, 2019 On 4/27/2019 at 11:26 AM, Dubz41 said: This is convoluted and confusing. That's not how you open communication lines. Head games and manipulation? Not a plan to move forward with. This is Wisconsin. Passive aggression is how it's done here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.