KellChippy Posted April 30, 2019 Share Posted April 30, 2019 11 hours ago, babyatemydingo said: Only in terms of volume. Otherwise, his per touch was higher as a #2. I still view him as a complementary back Yes, just like every other running back, his efficiency numbers dropped with increased volume and responsibilities. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hockey5djh Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 On 4/28/2019 at 1:23 AM, ninjapirate said: im just messing around You've gone soft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babyatemydingo Posted May 4, 2019 Share Posted May 4, 2019 On 4/30/2019 at 1:05 PM, KellChippy said: Yes, just like every other running back, his efficiency numbers dropped with increased volume and responsibilities. Exactly. Read the quote to which I responded. I'll save you the reading. It said that he was better in the full time role. But, those numbers only reflected volume, not efficiency. My point was that he's best in a smaller role. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KellChippy Posted May 5, 2019 Share Posted May 5, 2019 18 hours ago, babyatemydingo said: Exactly. Read the quote to which I responded. I'll save you the reading. It said that he was better in the full time role. But, those numbers only reflected volume, not efficiency. My point was that he's best in a smaller role. He only had 37 touches from scrimmage in his sophomore year, and 27 as a freshman. I don’t think that’s a big enough sample size to prove much about him. Assuming it is, he averaged 6 yards per touch as a sophomore and 5.8 as a junior. Considering he was on the field for short yardage situations as a junior, I would expect a bigger difference. If you are talking about some advanced efficiency stats, I’ll take your word for it. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianlewis16 Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 On 5/1/2019 at 3:07 PM, Hockey5djh said: You've gone soft. yeah wtf was that? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 Nothing official. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeezla Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 (edited) 45 minutes ago, Danger said: Nothing official. Refuses to step out of that shadow. Now the comparisons will never cease. Should have took 25. Edited May 6, 2019 by Jeezla Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Jeezla said: Refuses to step out of that shadow To be fair, there aren't many RB numbers available right now. 25, 26, or 39 right now are the only ones available. 25 is Shady's number, and Sanders is from the Pitt area so he probably was quite familiar with LeSean. 39 just ain't a shifty backs number. That's for a power back. I hope he takes 28 when we eventually cut Smallwood. Edited May 6, 2019 by Danger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeezla Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 Just now, Danger said: To be fair, there aren't many RB numbers available right now. 25, 26, or 39 right now are the only ones available. 25 is Shady's number, and Sanders is from the Pitt area so he probably was quite familiar with LeSean. 39 just ain't a shifty backs number. That's for a power back. I like 40 for RB's, like a .40 cal bullet. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 Just now, Jeezla said: I like 40 for RB's, like a .40 cal bullet. Something's wrong with you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeezla Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Danger said: Something's wrong with you. .40 cal bullet is my favorite handgun round. I always thought it made sense as a # for an RB that can do some damage to a defense. Same for 45. or 38. Edited May 6, 2019 by Jeezla Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 Just now, Jeezla said: .40 cal bullet is my favorite handgun round. I always thought it made sense as a # for an RB that can do some damage to a defense. Just not aesthetically pleasing. 20-37 are only acceptable numbers for a RB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeezla Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 Just now, Danger said: Just not aesthetically pleasing. 20-37 are only acceptable numbers for a RB. 20-29, 36, 38, 40, 45 are the only good RB #s. 36 would suck if not for Westy. 38, 40, 45 are good RB #'s for RB's that can bring the boom or bullet through the line like Darrell Henderson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 Just now, Jeezla said: 20-29, 36, 38, 40, 45 are the only good RB #s. 36 would suck if not for Westy. 38, 40, 45 are good RB #'s for RB's that can bring the boom or bullet through the line like Darrell Henderson. 37 is good because: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeezla Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Danger said: 37 is good because: Never cared for him outside of fantasy. He was great, I just personally never gave 2 poops about him. Probably because he wore # 37. Edited May 6, 2019 by Jeezla Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.