Tetsujin Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 I like the idea of Aaron Jones with Matt LaFleur. Dion Lewis was targeted 67 times last season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ttitansfan4life Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 On 6/22/2019 at 7:03 AM, SBLIII said: Henry is a top 10 RB If he can run like he did the last 4-5 games, he’s a top 5 back but I’m not really expecting that. The offense should definitely run off of him though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 On 6/23/2019 at 3:16 PM, KellChippy said: Joe Mixon is gonna blow up this year. He really knows how to pack a punch when he blows up too. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 4 minutes ago, MWil23 said: He really knows how to pack a punch when he blows up too. He's got nothing on LeGarrette Blount. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 Just now, Danger said: He's got nothing on LeGarrette Blount. Mixon and Blount could pack a really mean 1-2 punch though. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingseanjohn Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 1 hour ago, Buckweath said: Williams is clearly not a top 10 RB going into next season. His best season was last year and he just played a few games and finished with less than 500 total yards. Sure he was great during those few games but that's just a few games. I do think he will be good and be productive next season but he doesn't belong anywhere near any top 10 list right now. Based on the overall 2018 season, I agree. But we're talking about a RB in an Andy Reid offense going into 2019. Williams didn't really play until week 13 and took over in week 15. In the regular season he rushed for 255yds. While that isn't a lot, it was only on 37 rushes, averaging 6.9 yds/att. He caught 20 of 21 passes for142yds or 28.4yds/rec. He had 6 total TD over those games. The first two games he was splitting caries with Ware, who had 20 and 15 touches himself. Plus, we all know Andy doesn't always run the ball. In the playoffs he rushed for 159yds on 35 attempts (4.5avg) and 2 TD while catching 10 of 14 passes for 91yds and 2 TD. I don't think that Williams is a top 10 talented or gifted RB in the league. But I think playing in Reid's offense will play to his strengths and give him the stats of a top 10 RB this year. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman(DH23) Posted June 26, 2019 Share Posted June 26, 2019 On 6/24/2019 at 12:37 PM, SBLIII said: They think Montgomery is going to be good because Nagy is an offensive genius with his 21st ranked total offense. That's an incredibly deceiving stat. Total offense just means total offensive yards. When you're defense is constantly giving you short fields you arent going to rack up yards. The Bears were 6th in scoring offense. Which again is deceiving bc the defense was constantly giving the offense short fields. They were probably somewhere between 12-16 truly last year, which when you were the worst before is a pretty significant jump. The offense will likely move to top 10 this year, maybe top 5 as they lost their gigantic tell in Howard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrantikRam Posted June 26, 2019 Share Posted June 26, 2019 2 hours ago, Superman(DH23) said: That's an incredibly deceiving stat. Total offense just means total offensive yards. When you're defense is constantly giving you short fields you arent going to rack up yards. The Bears were 6th in scoring offense. Which again is deceiving bc the defense was constantly giving the offense short fields. They were probably somewhere between 12-16 truly last year, which when you were the worst before is a pretty significant jump. The offense will likely move to top 10 this year, maybe top 5 as they lost their gigantic tell in Howard. I think points can be the deceiving stat. Chicago was 9th in points scored but their defense scored them quite a few TDs, and then short fields that lead to FGs shouldn't be credited to the offense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman(DH23) Posted June 26, 2019 Share Posted June 26, 2019 Just now, FrantikRam said: I think points can be the deceiving stat. Chicago was 9th in points scored but their defense scored them quite a few TDs, and then short fields that lead to FGs shouldn't be credited to the offense. But you have to do that for everybody and it becomes a mess. They are both deceiving. As I said they were middle of the pack. The defense scored 5 TDs IIRC, so it's not some hugely different #, but the short fields from the takeaways certainly had an effect on both scoring and yardage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrantikRam Posted June 26, 2019 Share Posted June 26, 2019 2 minutes ago, Superman(DH23) said: But you have to do that for everybody and it becomes a mess. They are both deceiving. As I said they were middle of the pack. The defense scored 5 TDs IIRC, so it's not some hugely different #, but the short fields from the takeaways certainly had an effect on both scoring and yardage. Six by my count. Which would have the offense under 24 ppg. But that doesn't take into account FGs off a short field. Middle of the pack feels about right. I personally trust yards or yards/play more than points - Bears were 20th in yards/play. I think that points can be fluky (ST/defensive TDs, INT returns to the redzone, etc.) but yards let you know how consistently your offense is beating the defense anywhere on the field. Can be misleading too, but it's what I prefer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwibrown Posted June 27, 2019 Author Share Posted June 27, 2019 On 26/06/2019 at 3:41 AM, MWil23 said: Mixon and Blount could pack a really mean 1-2 punch though. Mixon is more of a one punch guy iirc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.