JBURGE Posted July 19, 2019 Share Posted July 19, 2019 Good. The NFL has shown they will suspend stars if necessary (Zeke). Glad they took their time with this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted July 19, 2019 Share Posted July 19, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted July 19, 2019 Share Posted July 19, 2019 20 minutes ago, ramssuperbowl99 said: Uhh yeah. The NFL's statement says "we can't see any of the evidence because it's all sealed, so we have no evidence and can't suspend him". It's not a glowing review dude. Sure, and Tyreek was not charged from the court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramssuperbowl99 Posted July 19, 2019 Share Posted July 19, 2019 1 minute ago, JBURGE said: Sure, and Tyreek was not charged from the court. Which operates on a much higher burden of proof than the NFL. Preponderance of the evidence versus beyond a reasonable doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted July 19, 2019 Share Posted July 19, 2019 Quote “I didn’t do nothing,” Hill states. “Then why does [censored] say ‘Daddy did it?’” Espinal asks. “I don’t know. He says Daddy does a lot of things!” Hill responds. Espinal also is heard on the clip alleging that Hill punches the toddler in the chest “when he starts crying.” “And when he gets in trouble, you get the belt out,” Espinal reportedly tells Hill, after saying the toddler is “terrified” of him. “And you say he respects you, but it’s not respect,” she said. “Its terrify, he’s terrified of you.” “You need to be terrified of me too, -,” Hill responds. “That’s why you can’t keep a - man.” It's a matter of time until he slips up again and he's done for good. Until then, give him a huge contract Chiefs! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefer Posted July 19, 2019 Share Posted July 19, 2019 2 minutes ago, JBURGE said: Sure, and Tyreek was not charged from the court. Or by child protective services either. Innocent until proven guilty still lives Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted July 19, 2019 Share Posted July 19, 2019 3 minutes ago, ramssuperbowl99 said: 5 minutes ago, JBURGE said: Sure, and Tyreek was not charged from the court. Which operates on a much higher burden of proof than the NFL. Preponderance of the evidence versus beyond a reasonable doubt. This is very true. I remember completely flipping to the pro NFL side after this discussion for the Zeke case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramssuperbowl99 Posted July 19, 2019 Share Posted July 19, 2019 1 minute ago, JBURGE said: 5 minutes ago, ramssuperbowl99 said: 7 minutes ago, JBURGE said: Sure, and Tyreek was not charged from the court. Which operates on a much higher burden of proof than the NFL. Preponderance of the evidence versus beyond a reasonable doubt. This is very true. I remember completely flipping to the pro NFL side after this discussion for the Zeke case. And in this case specifically, which burden of proof you use as a standard is really important since there are 2 possible suspects. In essence, you're starting from a coin flip, and the difference between 50.1% to > 99% (or whatever, I'm assuming that's the rough standard for what people mean when they said reasonable doubt) is absolutely massive. The NFL knows all of this, and I think that's why they worded that statement as aggressively as they did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom cody Posted July 19, 2019 Share Posted July 19, 2019 Saw the news on Hill, bit surprised on that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefer Posted July 19, 2019 Share Posted July 19, 2019 8 minutes ago, RaidersAreOne said: It's a matter of time until he slips up again and he's done for good. Until then, give him a huge contract Chiefs! Is that the full transcription? Or just the edited footage they released to the public? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiefs82 Posted July 19, 2019 Share Posted July 19, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fl0nkerton Posted July 19, 2019 Share Posted July 19, 2019 yuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas5737 Posted July 19, 2019 Share Posted July 19, 2019 Because this would have been such a disgusting act I don't think you could have said 2 games or 4 games it had to be all or nothing. As far as the threats he made about his baby mama should be scared of him or whatever I guess they could have acted on but people would have still associated it with the child and been looked at negatively for being such a small suspension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ty21 Posted July 19, 2019 Share Posted July 19, 2019 So that 8 hour interview with him was just to like scrub evidence then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vikes_Bolts1228 Posted July 19, 2019 Share Posted July 19, 2019 Hopefully he looks in the mirror and see's how close he was to having his career absolutely ruined and losing out on hundreds of millions of dollars and turns a corner...... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts