JBURGE Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 Just now, Packerraymond said: 6 minutes ago, JBURGE said: If Adams is correct when he says he is aiming to be back next week @ KC, we will likely be okay, but with how good this defense is I would rather be more than okay. I'd be willing to give a 4th for Sanders, not higher. I would not be willing to give anything for AJ Green unless he would re-sign here, but doing that will put too much money at WR. What makes sense for AJ is to either stay in Cinci under a big extension, or to be traded somewhere that would re-sign him for a big extension (my guess is San Fran), because they would be willing to give more. You wouldn't rent Green for a 3rd? You're renting Sanders too. What's the difference? My expectation is Green will go for a 2nd +, or even a 1st, for whatever reason. That's why I'm not biting. If we could get him for a 3rd, then sure. We would likely get a 3rd round comp pick for AJ in 2021 as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasquatch Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 This has Patriots written all over it, doesn't it? Packers are an outside possibility. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 3 minutes ago, Sasquatch said: This has Patriots written all over it, doesn't it? Packers are an outside possibility. Hooper has been a stud this year. That pairing is worth a 2nd and a 2021 pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
15412 Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 16 minutes ago, Sasquatch said: My tribe of squatch like messin with fire - especially with folks sitting around fire. Fire bad - but throwin rocks or melons from a distance at those sitting by one is bowling to us. I know he's a TE but wound Cincy part with Eifert? Really trying to find a playmaker here....Sanders in Denver the most likely but not the most desired. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
15412 Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 4 minutes ago, Sasquatch said: This has Patriots written all over it, doesn't it? Packers are an outside possibility. Either Sanu or Hooper would be great but both? Christmas cometh early but oh the cost.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasquatch Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Hooper has been a stud this year. That pairing is worth a 2nd and a 2021 pick. I honestly would hate to see this happen for the Patriots, but they are in need of both a WR and a TE so it kinda makes sense. I have Hooper on my fantasy team and he's been solid for Atlanta this year for sure. Edited October 18, 2019 by Sasquatch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebpackfan Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 2 hours ago, {Family Ghost} said: I hope our big move wasn't the singing of Ryan Grant. Hey, I heard he does a mean Tony Bennett. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lodestar Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 50 minutes ago, Sasquatch said: This has Patriots written all over it, doesn't it? Packers are an outside possibility. 800 Twitter followers... gonna call BS on this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chili Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 WR deepest position group we said..... So good that we must keep 7 WRs for final 53 we said.... ......... Actual result: dumpster fire position group. Who would've thunk it!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 1 minute ago, Chili said: WR deepest position group we said..... So good that we must keep 7 WRs for final 53 we said.... ......... Actual result: dumpster fire position group. Who would've thunk it!? Adams, MVS, Allison, EQ, Davis, Kumerow, Sheppard, Lazard....... Thats a nice spread of talent. They call them injuries. Tends to screw up your depth. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebpackfan Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 Plus there is a lot of young ‘uns in there. Not surprising they can’t just step in and be super productive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 20 minutes ago, Chili said: WR deepest position group we said..... So good that we must keep 7 WRs for final 53 we said.... ......... Actual result: dumpster fire position group. Who would've thunk it!? Just took injuries to #1, 2, 3 and 4/5 (EQ) for your point to be proven! Good call! 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted October 18, 2019 Author Share Posted October 18, 2019 25 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Just took injuries to #1, 2, 3 and 4/5 (EQ) for your point to be proven! Good call! We have a new "they are overrated because they might get injured" nominee! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chili Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 31 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Just took injuries to #1, 2, 3 and 4/5 (EQ) for your point to be proven! Good call! my point wasn't proven because I thought we had an excellent WR group. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfman Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 3 minutes ago, Chili said: my point wasn't proven because I thought we had an excellent WR group. We still might we a lot better depth because they are being forced to play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.