Kiwibrown Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 But why release? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bucketheadsdad Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 So, does this mean he's not playing week 1? I'm sorry, but cutting your LT for even one week could be wreckless. I get the idea of saving cash, but this might be dangerous for the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdrawkcab321 Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwibrown Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 Bob to offer Robinson lifetime contract Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brownie man Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 10 minutes ago, sdrawkcab321 said: Makes sense he’s our only legit player that happens to be on a one year contract. We could’ve lost the other guys we wanted who are on one years Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwibrown Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 6 minutes ago, brownie man said: Makes sense he’s our only legit player that happens to be on a one year contract. We could’ve lost the other guys we wanted who are on one years I dont see why we arent losing Robinson though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSURacerDT55 Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 lets all just take a breath and relax 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistakey Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 Everyone wants Greg gone until he’s gone and then everyone freaks the f out 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buno67 Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 31 minutes ago, Bucketheadsdad said: So, does this mean he's not playing week 1? I'm sorry, but cutting your LT for even one week could be wreckless. I get the idea of saving cash, but this might be dangerous for the season. No he will still play wk1 but it’s a loop hole the browns are abusing. Just the FO found a way to keep an extra roster spot without losing a player for an entire year 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas5737 Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 Obviously Robinson wants to be here or they wouldn't have done this but it is quite odd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruceb Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 2 minutes ago, buno67 said: No he will still play wk1 but it’s a loop hole the browns are abusing. Just the FO found a way to keep an extra roster spot without losing a player for an entire year Since when do we know to do things like that? DePo? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bucketheadsdad Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 15 minutes ago, buno67 said: No he will still play wk1 but it’s a loop hole the browns are abusing. Just the FO found a way to keep an extra roster spot without losing a player for an entire year So basically, they are doing this without officially exposing him to waivers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buno67 Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Bucketheadsdad said: So basically, they are doing this without officially exposing him to waivers? So he isnt subject to it. Prolly why they did it. I wonder, why he isnt subject to it? Edited September 1, 2019 by buno67 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buno67 Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 31 minutes ago, Thomas5737 said: Obviously Robinson wants to be here or they wouldn't have done this but it is quite odd. just manipulating the hell out of the roster rules. Browns prolly said they would kick him some more money willing to accept. Also if you were Robinson, would you want to go some where else? Would you want to learn a new playbook in a week? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchdigger Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 51 minutes ago, buno67 said: So he isnt subject to it. Prolly why they did it. I wonder, why he isnt subject to it? He is a vested veteran, not subject to waiver claims. Same reason Shady McCoy was able to sign with Kansas City within hours of being cut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.