incognito_man Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 Feels newsworthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wackywabbit Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 But he's allowed to play week 1 against the Giants on primetime. That's... interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILoveTheVikings Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 LOL BS. NFL >>>>>>>>> Cops apparently Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 1 minute ago, wackywabbit said: But he's allowed to play week 1 against the Giants on primetime. That's... interesting. I thought the same. i think it actually had to do with payroll apparently. Forget where i read it, but thats why they needed a decision by EOB. When they didn't get it, it made more sense to allow him to play in case the decision went against them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 That's so weird. I was really confused to see upheld but will play week 1. And also he would sit Weeks 2-8 since his bye is week 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOGRIESE Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 11 minutes ago, ILoveTheVikings said: LOL BS. NFL >>>>>>>>> Cops apparently Next time maybe the players should be careful when they agree to the CBA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, GOGRIESE said: Next time maybe the players should be careful when they agree to the CBA Yeah, thats kind of on them. They should fight harder on this next cba, and truthfully, the nfl should be more than willing to meet them on some sort of new disciplinary procedure as this hasn't been a great look for them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotsWin! Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 Big surprise... not. I don't know why Cowboy fans got their hopes up after seeing how the NFL handled Brady's appeal two years ago. Goodell was never going to change his mind, the NFL's appeals process is a sham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gmen Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 Well, this completely defeats the purpose of this witch hunt! -John Mara The Giants may be the best equipped defense to handle the Cowboys running game anyway. Snacks is a one man run stuffing machine. Landon Collins will live in the box and dare them to throw the ball. Both JPP and Vernon are good against the run. Should be another fun matchup even though much of America is sick of seeing these teams square off in prime time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
childofpudding Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 Dude needs new attorneys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotsWin! Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 4 minutes ago, childofpudding said: Dude needs new attorneys. (bravo, this is actually the correct spelling) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roysmyboy31 Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 I was expecting this. I'll still say I think we will be OK as long as we go .500 in the games he misses (maybe 2-4, but that might be a stretch). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broncofan Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 4 minutes ago, roysmyboy31 said: I was expecting this. I'll still say I think we will be OK as long as we go .500 in the games he misses (maybe 2-4, but that might be a stretch). I think you need to go 3-3 or better those last 4 games are a bear (@NYG @OAK vs. SEA @PHI). Us facing DAL with no Zeke given how bad our run D is a huge swing. That OL is great but make no mistake they were great in 2015 and their run game wasn't nearly as dominant. Huge blow if no TRO is issued. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MightyMouse07 Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 The restraining order will most likely be upheld and the suspension won't happen this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirk Gently Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 Judge expressed displeasure at the timing of the statement (Henderson's decision was announced with 10-15 mins to go in tonight's proceedings) and seemed to indicate that Elliott had legitimate case. Also, no one is seeming to notice this but the NFL's central argument against the TRO was that Elliott had not exhausted all options because Henderson hadn't ruled. Henderson's ruling makes their central argument moot. Expect TRO to go through and Elliott to play all games this year. Next year? well reading through this, the NFL has a lot to overcome here: https://twitter.com/i/moments/903796071306055680 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.