Jump to content

FA 2020


drfrey13

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, SilverNBlackFan said:

If Gruden can get Bell, Booker gets cut. The bye week is the perfect time to get him up to speed with offense.

Posters on here said they didn't want Bell because Booker has been playing well, lol. And Gruden just gave Booker a shout out earlier this week saying that he wants to give him a bigger role going forward. But at the end of the day if we can add another All-Pro level player screw Booker and Richard. 

Our backs are averaging 32 touches per game with Jacobs accounting for 24 of those. Jacobs is on pace to set the franchise record for most touches in a season adding Bell would let us use him less and keep him fresh. Reduce Jacobs touches to like 18-20 per game and give Bell 12-14. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Humble_Beast said:

See ya Richard... could give Bell his role, but Bell has lost a step...

Richard and Booker will lose their touches if we sign Bell because he's a better runner than Booker and a better receiver than Richard. Bell definitely didn't play well last year but he was also playing behind one of the worst OL's in football. We've seen Jacobs YPC dip significantly this year without Richie and Trent but still an above average OL overall blocking for him. 

He actually looked pretty good against the Cardinals last week, finished with 13 carries for 60 yards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/15/2020 at 1:52 AM, NYRaider said:

Posters on here said they didn't want Bell because Booker has been playing well, lol. And Gruden just gave Booker a shout out earlier this week saying that he wants to give him a bigger role going forward. But at the end of the day if we can add another All-Pro level player screw Booker and Richard. 

Our backs are averaging 32 touches per game with Jacobs accounting for 24 of those. Jacobs is on pace to set the franchise record for most touches in a season adding Bell would let us use him less and keep him fresh. Reduce Jacobs touches to like 18-20 per game and give Bell 12-14. 

It’s almost funny to have people say they wouldn’t add Bell because of it taking carries from Booker.  Yes Booker has been a very pleasant suprise, especially last week, but he only has 17 carries so far.  He’s run for 29, -1, 31, 0, and 62 yards.  He’s only had 44 total offensive snaps.

im not trying to take anything away from his play or the pleasant suprise he’s been but... let’s be real here.  
 

I think the main reason to be against signing Bell is 1) his attitude and locker room presence especially if he’s not the starter and 2) he’s a rhythm, volume runner and needs a lot of consecutive carries to be successful, and he wouldn’t get that here without totally disturbing the offense.  We’re better served and need a guy like Booker that can sit on the sidelines and get called into the game randomly for a few plays here and there and be successful in those plays.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jimkelly02 said:

It’s almost funny to have people say they wouldn’t add Bell because of it taking carries from Booker.  Yes Booker has been a very pleasant suprise, especially last week, but he only has 17 carries so far.  He’s run for 29, -1, 31, 0, and 62 yards.  He’s only had 44 total offensive snaps.

im not trying to take anything away from his play or the pleasant suprise he’s been but... let’s be real here.  
 

I think the main reason to be against signing Bell is 1) his attitude and locker room presence especially if he’s not the starter and 2) he’s a rhythm, volume runner and needs a lot of consecutive carries to be successful, and he wouldn’t get that here without totally disturbing the offense.  We’re better served and need a guy like Booker that can sit on the sidelines and get called into the game randomly for a few plays here and there and be successful in those plays.  

This was my one and only reason needed to not want him. He chased a payday with the Jets over better teams. He's not interested in team success. He's a headache waiting to happen. 

I'm certainly not a fan of the Steelers, but they're a classy organization. When they give up trying with someone who has undeniable talent, I take notice. Bryant, Brown, Bell- all of them are unquestionably talented when they're motivated. The Steelers were perfectly happy letting them all go. 

We were on the bad end of 2 of them already. I have zero interest in returning to that well for a 3rd time. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, agarcia34 said:

Raiders should be calling up David Irving. He is exactly what the Raiders need. Can play him at DE and DT. Let’s use our Cowboy connection and bring him in. 

Instead waste time on washed Bell, look to help the defense. FS and another impact lineman would be huge 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, jimkelly02 said:

It’s almost funny to have people say they wouldn’t add Bell because of it taking carries from Booker.  Yes Booker has been a very pleasant suprise, especially last week, but he only has 17 carries so far.  He’s run for 29, -1, 31, 0, and 62 yards.  He’s only had 44 total offensive snaps.

im not trying to take anything away from his play or the pleasant suprise he’s been but... let’s be real here.  
 

I think the main reason to be against signing Bell is 1) his attitude and locker room presence especially if he’s not the starter and 2) he’s a rhythm, volume runner and needs a lot of consecutive carries to be successful, and he wouldn’t get that here without totally disturbing the offense.  We’re better served and need a guy like Booker that can sit on the sidelines and get called into the game randomly for a few plays here and there and be successful in those plays.  

So all that to say, that Booker is doing fine and we don’t need Bell lol? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...