Tugboat Posted July 11, 2020 Share Posted July 11, 2020 On 07/07/2020 at 10:25 PM, .Buzz said: I truthfully think Yan is gone one way or another and we didn't seem to be getting a 1 so I'd say this would be intriguing. Gives us a talented young player that needs a change of scenery at a position where we're full of question marks (although there's optimism there...). So this would at least make me think personally. Yeah. It's not the worst offer i've seen. At least it is a really talented younger player at a position of obvious need for us. I still hate it though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted July 13, 2020 Author Share Posted July 13, 2020 On 7/11/2020 at 3:22 PM, Tugboat said: Yeah. It's not the worst offer i've seen. At least it is a really talented younger player at a position of obvious need for us. I still hate it though. Yeah, whatever we end up getting for Yan (if we do get something) won't satisfy us though. You never want to be dealing a good young PR. It is what it is though at this point. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 Pretty sure you guys will be back in the OC market in a matter of days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted July 16, 2020 Author Share Posted July 16, 2020 1 hour ago, Danger said: Pretty sure you guys will be back in the OC market in a matter of days. Ben McAdoo is the QB Coach. Think he's already in house. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 14 hours ago, Danger said: Pretty sure you guys will be back in the OC market in a matter of days. Wait why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MightyRx Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 14 minutes ago, JaguarCrazy2832 said: Wait why? There's news that will be dropping in the near future that involves the team from DC... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted July 16, 2020 Author Share Posted July 16, 2020 9 minutes ago, MightyRx said: There's news that will be dropping in the near future that involves the team from DC... With Mr. Gruden right in the crosshairs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted July 17, 2020 Share Posted July 17, 2020 5 hours ago, MightyRx said: There's news that will be dropping in the near future that involves the team from DC... Yikes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted July 17, 2020 Author Share Posted July 17, 2020 Well, the report didn't mention Gruden at all. So the coming days should be interesting to see if anything else leaks out or if he ends up being safe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted July 17, 2020 Share Posted July 17, 2020 There’s rumors that there was a lot, lot more going on. If those are true, Gruden is heavily implicated. But we’ll have to wait on it, because I see no verifiable info on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MightyRx Posted July 17, 2020 Share Posted July 17, 2020 (edited) In other news... https://twitter.com/BigCatCountry/status/1283958813113163777?s=09 Edited July 17, 2020 by MightyRx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted July 17, 2020 Author Share Posted July 17, 2020 4 hours ago, pwny said: There’s rumors that there was a lot, lot more going on. If those are true, Gruden is heavily implicated. But we’ll have to wait on it, because I see no verifiable info on it. Yeah, the early rumors had a lot more going on than the article. Wonder if those come to light or those were false. Will be an interesting week or two I imagine. 2 hours ago, MightyRx said: In other news... https://twitter.com/BigCatCountry/status/1283958813113163777?s=09 I saw that last night. My heart... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted July 27, 2020 Author Share Posted July 27, 2020 All while playing on an island versus the other teams top receiver week in and out. Not to mention his work against Chase was eye opening. Think we end up having a really good one here. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tugboat Posted July 29, 2020 Share Posted July 29, 2020 On 7/27/2020 at 12:07 PM, .Buzz said: All while playing on an island versus the other teams top receiver week in and out. Not to mention his work against Chase was eye opening. Think we end up having a really good one here. Corners playing "on an island" and deep, are probably going to have a higher number there, by the nature of their role. Same as good ballhawking zone corners are going to have higher INT numbers. Just less opportunity to directly be attributed a "forced incompletion", and more opportunity to snipe and interception. Don't really think that metric means much as to whether or not "we have a really good one here", beyond...what we already know, in that he was used in a certain type of way in college. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted July 29, 2020 Author Share Posted July 29, 2020 10 hours ago, Tugboat said: Corners playing "on an island" and deep, are probably going to have a higher number there, by the nature of their role. Same as good ballhawking zone corners are going to have higher INT numbers. Just less opportunity to directly be attributed a "forced incompletion", and more opportunity to snipe and interception. Don't really think that metric means much as to whether or not "we have a really good one here", beyond...what we already know, in that he was used in a certain type of way in college. I mean, the number is a percentage, not a total number of times he did something like your comparing interception wise. So even if he did have more opportunities it's not like that inflates it in itself. It can do that but it's still not apples to apples. Also, Clemson does the same thing and his is much higher than Terrell's. Until that LSU game in which Chase had a big game (think Terrell played well in that btw) he was viewed as right where he got drafted (top 15-20 player). Either way, no single stat shows that a guy is good or bad. Just another interesting stat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.