germ-x Posted August 8, 2020 Share Posted August 8, 2020 @Counselor another interesting one for me was Michael Pittman. I originally had him in the late 60s/early 70s like you. I threw my top 150 together quickly, in the span of basically a month and half. But Pittman was a guy that ended up being so damn solid I ended up having him at #39. I don’t know that he ever ends up being a outright #1 WR, but I also just don’t see him being bad. Terrific contested catch player. Solid route runner. Excellent hands. Showed the required athleticism at the combine. Willing blocker. Did the little things at USC and was a quality special teams player early in his career. Just checks off a lot of boxes. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted August 8, 2020 Share Posted August 8, 2020 4 minutes ago, germ-x said: @Counselor another interesting one for me was Michael Pittman. I originally had him in the late 60s/early 70s like you. I threw my top 150 together quickly, in the span of basically a month and half. But Pittman was a guy that ended up being so damn solid I ended up having him at #39. I don’t know that he ever ends up being a outright #1 WR, but I also just don’t see him being bad. Terrific contested catch player. Solid route runner. Excellent hands. Showed the required athleticism at the combine. Willing blocker. Did the little things at USC and was a quality special teams player early in his career. Just checks off a lot of boxes. Yeah he rose for me at the end of the process pretty significantly based on everything you stated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKRNA Posted August 11, 2020 Share Posted August 11, 2020 Looks like it may get a bit tougher to rank the prospects since the BIG 10 just cancelled the season and the PAC 12 looks ready to follow suit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
germ-x Posted August 12, 2020 Share Posted August 12, 2020 5 hours ago, AKRNA said: Looks like it may get a bit tougher to rank the prospects since the BIG 10 just cancelled the season and the PAC 12 looks ready to follow suit. Yep. It’s why I thought the supplemental draft could’ve been really interesting this year. Could’ve had a lot more quality prospects enter and give NFL franchises a reason to use higher picks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.