Jump to content

2020 College Prospects


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, thebestever6 said:

Tank the rest of the season... Trade down if you can aquire two or three firsts by trading back up ala Giants 2019.

Go Moses from Bama.

Jalen Hurts as your (Taysom Hill gadget utility player)

Tackle from Oregon because bigpalooka likes him and I trust big Palooka.

Lock will be your point guard. Fant, Sutton, Hurts, Lindsay, Freeman, BPA wr in the 3rd hopefully guy from liberty. 

This offense can be extremely dangerous with that scenario. 

Drafting Hurts to be a Taysom Hill player is a complete waste of a 1st round pick and incredibly unnecessary. If Denver did this, they should be drafting OL and DL players and a LB.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, broncos67 said:

Drafting Hurts to be a Taysom Hill player is a complete waste of a 1st round pick and incredibly unnecessary. If Denver did this, they should be drafting OL and DL players and a LB.

You're probably right lol just having two guys roaming around in an offense that can throw the ball would be next level.

-I'm not sure How Jalens hands are, or how his running ability is compared to Jackson, or pass blocking. All those boxes would have to be checked.

- I just view Freeman as a goalline/closer type rb so there is value to be had.

- also doesn't hurt Hedging your bets on Lock if Jalen offers enough versatility else where.

He is 6'2 225 so he looks like he has some versatility as a runner at least and a passer to have the type of collegiate success.

 

Edited by thebestever6
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, thebestever6 said:

You're probably right lol just having two guys roaming around in an offense that can throw the ball would be next level.

-I'm not sure How Jalens hands are, or how his running ability is compared to Jackson, or pass blocking. All those boxes would have to be checked.

- I just view Freeman as a goalline/closer type rb so there is value to be had.

- also doesn't hurt Hedging your bets on Lock if Jalen offers enough versatility else where.

He is 6'2 225 so he looks like he has some versatility as a runner at least and a passer to have the type of collegiate success.

 

If you are spending a first on Hurts, he needs to be used at QB. There's lots of guys who function like Taysom Hill in the back of the draft. Hill isn't a QB. I think Freeman has more value to this team than people think because Lindsay's wrist isn't 100% still (they said that yesterday on air) and Denver is likely going to try and protect him as much as possible. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, broncos67 said:

There's lots of guys who function like Taysom Hill in the back of the draft.

Who are those guys? Belichick values them Edelman/ Sanu and so does Rich. Look at Fant and all his rbs all versatile. 

Look at the niners drafting Jaylen Hurds a wr/rb hybrid. 

If there are swiss army knives in this draft Rich will find them.

Edited by thebestever6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Travis Etienne is a nice prospect for this offense . Love him in round two if we decide to move down on draft day and aquire 2 seconds. Top of the second he has tremendous balance and vision. 

DeAndre Swift is also an amazing prospect wouldn't mind him in a Buffalo style trade down. Three headed monster at rb to turn this thing into a top 10 T.O.P offense. A young QB with DeAndre Swift a part of a committee man!!! Raiders picked Jacob's high feel like we have a similar plan. San Francisco can mess around at rb Because Jimmy G is a veteran. 

J.K Dobbins looks so smooth for 5'10 216 he's also a legitimate option round 2. He'd be aces in this offense. Limited break tackle ability but hits the hole 100 miles an hr.

 

Jonathan Taylor - Love himmmmm as a prospect. As much if not more in this offense. The issue his mileage in college. Ton of touches is gonna be close to 1000 by the end of this year.  If he fell back half round 2 early round 3 I'd take that bait. Also mileage isn't as important to me as getting Drew Lock a Legitimate Batman at runningback. In a 3 runningback commitee he could last awhile. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Najee Harris has some tools is very elusive. Also has break tackle ability but he uses like a Faux stiff arm and it's annoying if he uses it legitimately he's a first round talent and low mileage he's my favorite prospect post round 1 so far.

Chubba Hubbard - man hes explosive and has receiving ability he's a bigger Austin Eckler runs tough but bounces a lot out side him and Harris are definitely leaders in the club house for value post round 1.

Travis Etienne - close third hes such a patient smooth runner with amazing balance.

Edited by thebestever6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sustained winning happens with above-average to great QB play and trench play as the foundation.   Pick accordingly.   If there isn't a franchise QB talent (or in this case, to prevent Elway from whiffing on the wrong QB Herbert), BPA trench talent is amazing this year.   Not complicated for Rd1. 

Edited by Broncofan
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Broncofan said:

Pick accordingly.   If there isn't a franchise QB talent (or in this case, to prevent Elway from whiffing on the wrong QB Herbert), BPA trench talent is amazing this year.   Not complicated for Rd1. 

100% agree but man there's runningback talent that will fall to round 2. A young QB you want a triple threat rb commitee. 

Harris, Hubbard, and Etienne are definitely on my wish list. All have low mileage and bring tremendous juice to this offense. I see some Leveon Bell to Eteinnes game. 

The goal is to have a sustainable top 10 time of possesion offense.

Link to post
Share on other sites
 
 
 
 
 
 
4
2 minutes ago, thebestever6 said:

100% agree but man there's runningback talent that will fall to round 2. A young QB you want a triple threat rb commitee. 

Harris, Hubbard, and Etienne are definitely on my wish list. All have low mileage and bring tremendous juice to this offense. I see some Leveon Bell to Eteinnes game. 

The goal is to have a sustainable top 10 time of possesion offense.

You can get a really good RB talent in Rd3 with one of our 3 picks, or Rd 4 with one of our 2.     The RB pool is so deep we can easily get a Rd2 talent then.   

We have 5 picks in Rd 3-4.   We have 2 in Rd 1-2.   LT and WR, or LT-ILB (if the top 2 ILB's are still there), sure.   RB is not a good value pick at all at early 2nd.  Not when the RB pool is insanely deep.   The talent pool absolutely matters when looking at the talent pool.   We can get a 80+ grade RB in Rd3-4, and a 85-90 grade WR/ILB Rd2....no way the equation flips around the other way.   There's no BPA talent at RB this year who will likely surpass the WR available Rd2, but in Rd 3-4, the dropoff is going to be a lot larger in every non-RB position.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, germ-x said:

I would be PISSED if Denver took an RB in the top 2 rounds.  It’s not even close to a need.  They could use a depth back, but they don’t need to even be looking at an RB until the 4th/5th round.

You have to watch some video on those 3 guys Etienne is literally the perfect compliment to Lindsay. He runs soooooo patient watching so tape of him is like rb porn. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldn't even think about RB until SF's 3rd, and ideally you wait until the 5th or so. 

I'd be pissed if they go RB in Round 2, the 1st is unthinkable. It's both doing a poor job reading the board, and not attacking needs. Elite talent in the trenches and receiver would be a better use of resources. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, thebestever6 said:

You have to watch some video on those 3 guys Etienne is literally the perfect compliment to Lindsay. He runs soooooo patient watching so tape of him is like rb porn. 

I’ve seen them and I’m not saying they aren’t good, Taylor is my favorite, but it’s just not an area of that much concern considering all the other needs on this team.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...