Jump to content

Lamar vs Trubisky


Nazgul

Who is a worse thrower of the pigskin?  

50 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is a worse thrower of the pigskin?

    • Lamar Jackson
      24
    • The Bears QB
      26


Recommended Posts

On ‎10‎/‎21‎/‎2019 at 7:45 PM, diamondbull424 said:

Interesting that Lamar is still behind Trubisky in this poll. Did the poll close? The Bears with Jackson would be #1 in that tough division.

Sure about that?

6 of the Ravens' first 7 opponents currently have a bottom 10 defense....

4 of the Bears' first 6 opponents have a top 10 defense...

But, Lamar is clearly the second coming of Montana, so why bother with details...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MSURacerDT55 said:

So apparently no one can have anything less than a positive opinion of Jackson without Ravens fans coming around every corner defending him.

Nah, you can think Jackson is complete trash, that's your right. Just don't think he's worse than Mitchell "Dumpster Fire" Trubisky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, MSURacerDT55 said:

So apparently no one can have anything less than a positive opinion of Jackson without Ravens fans coming around every corner defending him.

Very weird of Ravens fans to show up in threads about Lamar Jackson, I agree.

Edited by BaltimoreTerp
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RavensTillIDie said:

Nah, you can think Jackson is complete trash, that's your right. Just don't think he's worse than Mitchell "Dumpster Fire" Trubisky.

Do you realize this same conversation is going on in EVERY Lamar vs. thread? As in there is a pattern? It should ok for people to be OBJECTIVE about him without being bombarded by his apologists

Edited by MSURacerDT55
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, MSURacerDT55 said:

Do you realize this same conversation is going on in EVERY Lamar vs. thread? As in there is a pattern? It should ok for people to be OBJECTIVE about him without being bombarded by his apologists

That's the problem, saying he's basically Mitchell Trubiski is being SUBJECTIVE, not OBJECTIVE.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MSURacerDT55 said:

Do you realize this same conversation is going on in EVERY Lamar vs. thread? As in there is a pattern? It should ok for people to be OBJECTIVE about him without being bombarded by his apologists

As @AFlaccoSeagulls just stated, being objective means using facts and accurate/fair analysis to justify your stance. The takes on Lamar being a "mediocre" passer are based in complete subjectivity, and more than likely those posters making said takes are going off hearsay and preconceived notions, but have seen little to none of Lamar this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...