Cheesehawk Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 50 minutes ago, 15412 said: Curious, do you think Dallas is hurt more missing T Smith or are we without Adams? My brother(Cowboys fan) and I had this conversation the other day and he actually said Adams. He thinks Rodgers tendency to lock on Adams will be more detrimental to our offense than the loss of Tyron will be to their offense. He also said that La'el Collins is about the only one who has proven they were worth the extension from all the contracts they signed to their vets over the offseason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 17 minutes ago, Cheesehawk said: My brother(Cowboys fan) and I had this conversation the other day and he actually said Adams. He thinks Rodgers tendency to lock on Adams will be more detrimental to our offense than the loss of Tyron will be to their offense. He also said that La'el Collins is about the only one who has proven they were worth the extension from all the contracts they signed to their vets over the offseason. I can't say any of this surprises me at all. I remember the one year Jordy went down and Adams had like 18 targets in the very first game after the injury. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 5 hours ago, HighCalebR said: So we runnin with Jones Dexter and Vitale? Seems kinds light. Are we expecting to toss the rock around this week? We may get away with some jet sweep stuff with Shepherd or MVS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 2 hours ago, 15412 said: Curious, do you think Dallas is hurt more missing T Smith or are we without Adams? Us and I don't think it's particularly close. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
15412 Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 It would surprise me so many might think Adams. Let's see if Rodgers now locks in on someone else with Adams out, or does he open it up and scatter at will? Hopefully the later, if so this could be a good thing long term. Maybe an old dog can come to believe in a new trick. New to him.... This game is winnable ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 1 hour ago, incognito_man said: Us and I don't think it's particularly close. Would you rather be without Bahk or Adams Sunday? Pretty much what we're discussing. I think it's closer than you make it seem, especially with the Smith's rested on a long week. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 4 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Would you rather be without Bahk or Adams Sunday? Pretty much what we're discussing. I think it's closer than you make it seem, especially with the Smith's rested on a long week. Bakh. I really don't think it's that close either with the make-up of this team. Adams is pretty damn critical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 21 minutes ago, incognito_man said: Bakh. I really don't think it's that close either with the make-up of this team. Adams is pretty damn critical. I personally think the offense performs better with MVS as #1 rather than Alex Light as LT. Remember there is the running game too, which Adams has a minimal effect on. It's certainly close. Hopefully we don't have to choose between either. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 5 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: I personally think the offense performs better with MVS as #1 rather than Alex Light as LT. Remember there is the running game too, which Adams has a minimal effect on. It's certainly close. Hopefully we don't have to choose between either. Bakh has a minimal effect on the running game too, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 41 minutes ago, incognito_man said: Bakh. I really don't think it's that close either with the make-up of this team. Adams is pretty damn critical. Make up of the team? No real quality depth at LT or #1WR so it’s pretty damn close 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopackgonerd Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 (edited) If Bulaga moved to LT in place of Bakh I maybe would feel better. It's hard, but I think I'm going to go with protection being more important. Say we are going up against the bears, theres no way I would want Adams over Bakh on the field if I had to choose. We need all the help we can get there. Ecspecially with our backup situation. Even this week it would be tough vs their rushers. Edited October 4, 2019 by Gopackgonerd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 3 minutes ago, Arthur Penske said: Make up of the team? No real quality depth at LT or #1WR so it’s pretty damn close I guess we will see whose offense looks more hindered soon. It's not like we would be losing All-Pro play with Bakh right now, either. In a smaller sample size, I think it's always far easier to mask worse OT play than WR play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebpackfan Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 I don't know which side this help, but on rewatching the All-22, I have decided Alex Light was much worse than I thought on live viewing. In fact, apart from the starting tackles, the whole line had their moments of terribleness. If Campen were still OL coach, I'd blame him. But I can't blame the new guy because I don't remember who it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopackgonerd Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 (edited) 8 minutes ago, incognito_man said: In a smaller sample size, I think it's always far easier to mask worse OT play than WR play. I think it's easier when you have better protection to give you more time to find an open WR. A lot of teams don't have quality backup OTs like us. You do however have a lot more options at Receiver. Also the fact that we need to keep our Franchise QB from getting killed whom has had 2 broken collarbones, concussions, and knee/leg injuries in his career. I would say Rodgers could just get the ball out quickly to adams, problem solved, but we know how he holds onto the ball for a long time sometimes. I just don't feel great without the blindside protecter. Edited October 4, 2019 by Gopackgonerd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaximusGluteus Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 5 hours ago, mikebpackfan said: I don't know which side this help, but on rewatching the All-22, I have decided Alex Light was much worse than I thought on live viewing. In fact, apart from the starting tackles, the whole line had their moments of terribleness. If Campen were still OL coach, I'd blame him. But I can't blame the new guy because I don't remember who it is. Can we blame the fact that Campen ISN'T here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.