Jump to content

packers bring in 1st round talent tim williams off of the waaivers


FinneasGage

how do we feel about this?  

49 members have voted

  1. 1. how do we feel about this?

    • very happy
    • happy
    • somehwat happy
    • indifferent
    • somewhat pissed
      0
    • pissed
      0
    • vwry pissed
      0


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, PACKRULE said:

I would have agreed last year but man he has been invisible this year. Mind you i have not re-watched every game taking a look at him.

Not a Fackrell fan here, but...I think he's been solid when in there.

I've come to admire his versatility.  He rush, he can drop.  And he can do them both well.  Very assignment sure.

I think when I've seen most often it is in some sort of blitz/drop package.  Like he's so versatile that having him out there really helps out that kind of package.

I've got no issues when Fack is out there.  He's come a long way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AlexGreen#20 said:

He's played like 30 snaps.

PFF has him at...

80 snaps.

37 pass.

24 run. 

19 coverage.

Total score of 59.9.

Which puts him at #77 in the league.  Right next to Beasley from Atlanta and Kerrigan from Washington.

P Smith is #16 with a score of 79.3.

Z Smith is #36 with a score of 72.6.

Just for comparison. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, vegas492 said:

PFF has him at...

80 snaps.

37 pass.

24 run. 

19 coverage.

Total score of 59.9.

Which puts him at #77 in the league.  Right next to Beasley from Atlanta and Kerrigan from Washington.

P Smith is #16 with a score of 79.3.

Z Smith is #36 with a score of 72.6.

Just for comparison. 

Curious where Bradley Chubb and Von Miller are on that list?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Norm said:

Hard not to like this claim honestly. Won't hurt anything and who knows...

it probably signals the end of Nick Perry's tiny chances of playing in GB in 2019


(Not that it was ever a thing ... except inside my cavernous cranium)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, PACKRULE said:

Ok so what does that mean if he can't seem the field Pettine doesn't want him out there in any sort of situation? He should be rested and be able to maybe provide something?

How many #3 or #4 edge guys are very “visible”?  & the sample size on this is minuscule. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TransientTexan said:

How many #3 or #4 edge guys are very “visible”?  & the sample size on this is minuscule. 

So the guy that lead our team last year in sacks can barely see the field over a 4 game span. His sample size is small because his play matches it. Nothing wrong with getting a contribution from your 3 or 4 edge. My point earlier was not to beat on Sackrell but I agreed with AG that I would also like to see more 52 on the field. Either way I like the claim on Williams and with Sackrell getting hurt in his whopping 80 snaps this year we need some back ups.

Edited by PACKRULE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...