Jroc04 Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 3 minutes ago, Kiltman said: Ramsey I get, Clowney at his price and this I do not. Bare minimum you keep him away from other teams, but more importantly you get someone who can actually do something for you out there (when he’s out there) Truly don’t get this one though, to not put in a claim?!? Im just sayin, massive talent available this year up for grabs and he doesn’t flinch. But Tate was worth a 3rd to him? Gordon was free. Could have been a cheap tryout and an easy Agholor replacement, who’s certainly walking next year. Puzzling. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ_Eaglesfan Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 Gordon has to have baggage right? If he didn't why wouldn't a worse team than us at least try to snag him for a comp pick going forward. Very odd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted November 2, 2019 Share Posted November 2, 2019 4 hours ago, AZ_Eaglesfan said: Gordon has to have baggage right? If he didn't why wouldn't a worse team than us at least try to snag him for a comp pick going forward. Very odd. Even if he only gets to play a couple of games, he doesn't cost much and has so much potential. It still makes no sense, comp pick or not. The risk is next to nothing and the reward could be huge if all goes well. I don't get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EaglesFlySBChampsHigh Posted November 2, 2019 Share Posted November 2, 2019 Any interest in moncrief? Probably a no Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted November 2, 2019 Share Posted November 2, 2019 1 hour ago, EaglesFlySBChampsHigh said: Any interest in moncrief? Probably a no I have more interest in resigning Dorial Green Beckham than I do Moncrief. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jroc04 Posted November 2, 2019 Share Posted November 2, 2019 Anything is better than seeing Mack Hollins out there. But lord help me if Howie claims Moncrief and not Gordon.... Pitts stood to lose that 3rd round Bell comp if he stayed on the roster. So, clearly, teams are very aware of their comp implications. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EaglesFlySBChampsHigh Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 6 hours ago, Danger said: I have more interest in resigning Dorial Green Beckham than I do Moncrief. That's cold lol. Love it tho Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninjapirate Posted November 3, 2019 Author Share Posted November 3, 2019 9 hours ago, Jroc04 said: Anything is better than seeing Mack Hollins out there. But lord help me if Howie claims Moncrief and not Gordon.... Pitts stood to lose that 3rd round Bell comp if he stayed on the roster. So, clearly, teams are very aware of their comp implications. I dont understand why we dont give greg ward a chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jroc04 Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 (edited) 10 minutes ago, ninjapirate said: I dont understand why we dont give greg ward a chance. Although Mack sucks, he’s good on STs. Bringing up Ward means they’d have to cut someone. Edited November 3, 2019 by Jroc04 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninjapirate Posted November 3, 2019 Author Share Posted November 3, 2019 1 minute ago, Jroc04 said: Although Mack sucks, he’s good on STs. Bringing up Ward means they’d have to cut someone. mack hasnt been good on special teams though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jroc04 Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 6 minutes ago, ninjapirate said: mack hasnt been good on special teams though Arguable. But he’s the best gunner we have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiltman Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 4 hours ago, Jroc04 said: Arguable. But he’s the best gunner we have. On kist and solak They through a number out there that was extremely low. i believe it was tackles and snaps best argument I’ve heard for him at this point is he’s doing a good job blocking Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jroc04 Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Kiltman said: On kist and solak They through a number out there that was extremely low. i believe it was tackles and snaps best argument I’ve heard for him at this point is he’s doing a good job blocking I’m not going to plant my flag on Mack Hollins street but I don’t think he’s been bad on STs. Not enough for me to notice him. As a gunner, you wanna beat blocks and HOPEFULLY make a tackle. Just as long as he gets down and dictates to the returner, force him to the other guys, etc it’s fine. Lets be clear, he’s not a good footballer. We can be doing much better. But his value is STs. Clearly. To the original point, if you bring up Ward you’re probably cutting someone else. Edited November 3, 2019 by Jroc04 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiltman Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 1 hour ago, Jroc04 said: I’m not going to plant my flag on Mack Hollins street but I don’t think he’s been bad on STs. Not enough for me to notice him. As a gunner, you wanna beat blocks and HOPEFULLY make a tackle. Just as long as he gets down and dictates to the returner, force him to the other guys, etc it’s fine. Lets be clear, he’s not a good footballer. We can be doing much better. But his value is STs. Clearly. To the original point, if you bring up Ward you’re probably cutting someone else. Yeah he hasn’t been noticeably bad there, but he’s not been playing special teams apparently?!? I’d assume with Desean back he can slide back into it more. But he’s like stuck between the two and not doing anything at either right now he’s only been out there a little over 16% of Special teams snaps this year. Obviously he’s not on every team, but he should be on most of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hockey5djh Posted November 4, 2019 Share Posted November 4, 2019 On 11/3/2019 at 8:32 AM, Jroc04 said: I’m not going to plant my flag on Mack Hollins street but I don’t think he’s been bad on STs. Not enough for me to notice him. As a gunner, you wanna beat blocks and HOPEFULLY make a tackle. Just as long as he gets down and dictates to the returner, force him to the other guys, etc it’s fine. Lets be clear, he’s not a good footballer. We can be doing much better. But his value is STs. Clearly. To the original point, if you bring up Ward you’re probably cutting someone else. On 11/3/2019 at 9:47 AM, Kiltman said: Yeah he hasn’t been noticeably bad there, but he’s not been playing special teams apparently?!? I’d assume with Desean back he can slide back into it more. But he’s like stuck between the two and not doing anything at either right now he’s only been out there a little over 16% of Special teams snaps this year. Obviously he’s not on every team, but he should be on most of them. I used to be on the Mack Hollins side strictly for special teams but he's played 36 snaps this year on special teams. That's 4 per game, If you take out the Atlanta game where he had 13 special teams snaps it drops down to 2.5 snaps per game which is basically the kickoffs at the beginning of each half. Of those 36 snaps he's made a single tackle this year. Listen, I get the importance of having a special teams ace. Matthew Slater on NE in comparison has 164 snaps and 12 tackles. Hollins just ain't it this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.