PossibleCabbage Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 This is a really hard one for me to interpret without additional context. The Seahawks have been known to look really bad on offense (they scored 15 points combined in their first two games last year), and at the same time have been known to look tremendous on defense. So that the Packers defense looked great and offense struggled might simply respect the opposition, but the early returns are positive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packerjmf Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Best GIF from the game. Really impressed by our front seven. Still not completely sold on our secondary. We need Bulaga back so Aaron doesn't have to take another beating like today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haha21 Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Game ball goes to Daniels. He swung the momentum in our favor and was a terror for Russell Wilson. I think we came out reasonably healthy didn't we? Brooks was concussed but I think that may have been the only big injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skibrett15 Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 1 hour ago, AlexGreen#20 said: Incog, weren't you and I challenged at some point during the off-season to come up with a game where the Packers offense scored fewer than 20 points and the team won? yes you were. This is 1. This looks like a D that can win games. And @incognito_man my point was that GB doesn't win when TEAM scores <20. Thank you for identifying a different metric which I'm certain is just as true for other teams with decent to good Defenses. Other teams still do so at a much higher rate. I maintain that point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted September 11, 2017 Author Share Posted September 11, 2017 39 minutes ago, pollino14 said: Mike Daniels was the obvious player of the game, but shout out to Morgan Burnett and Clay Matthews . Burnett was everywhere, making plays. Clay was disruptive as hell too. Rollins , HHCD and Clark stood out to me to a lesser extent too. i think Perry deserves mention as well. He killed it early then kept drawing multiple blocker attention thereafter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MNPackfan32 Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Positive: Mike Daniels Nick Perry Randy Cobb DH31 DB69 Jordy KC97 Negative: Mac's TO's (wtf?) Evans Brooks concussion I didn't think DR23 looked very good Rodgers INT Rodgers taking dumb sacks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revel8 Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 3 minutes ago, incognito_man said: i think Perry deserves mention as well. He killed it early then kept drawing multiple blocker attention thereafter. You're both right. The Packers' D was solid all around. Their run D looks like it could be among the best in the league. Mike Daniels continues to remind of Reggie White when matched up 1 vs 1. Daniels is not Reggie, he doesn't even play the same position as Reggie, but Daniels is an absolute beast up the middle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jiggad369 Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Daniels for DPOY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 We were way more physical than the Seahawks. We won the type of game they used to beat us at. These aren't your 2013 or 2014 Packers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 8 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: We were way more physical than the Seahawks. We won the type of game they used to beat us at. These aren't your 2013 or 2014 Packers. Not your 2013 or 2014 Seahawks either. That offensive line is the worst. They used to just suck at pass blocking. Now they suck at everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopackgonerd Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 3 hours ago, deltarich87 said: Over 90 apy and a TD against that defense I'll take it. Looking for him to have a better day next week in Atlanta Loved how Cobb looked out there today Cobb looked fast and caught everything, why people wanted him gone is beyond me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cakeshoppe Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 This defense is my jam. DL was terrorizing out there. I'll echo a few people about not being able to parse out how much of a lot of this game was due to bad OL play and good DL play by both sides. I will say I'm not too worried about the offense. Kick coverage could improve. There was no need to take the TOs that allowed SEA to score at the end of the first half. If they had been trying to run out the clock, chances were pretty slim that we would get the ball back.It was just unnecessary. We got some friendly officiating but SEA is the last team in the world that gets to complain about contact in the secondary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cakeshoppe Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Just now, Cakeshoppe said: This defense is my jam. DL was terrorizing out there. I'll echo a few people about not being able to parse out how much of a lot of this game was due to bad OL play and good DL play by both sides. I will say I'm not too worried about the offense. Kick coverage could improve. There was no need to take the TOs that allowed SEA to score at the end of the first half. If they had been trying to run out the clock, chances were pretty slim that we would get the ball back.It was just unnecessary. We got some friendly officiating but SEA is the last team in the world that gets to complain about contact in the secondary. Good adjustments to protection in the 2nd half though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PackyAttacky Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Who said Daniels was overrated on here? cause without him you lose today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TransientTexan Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 23 minutes ago, AlexGreen#20 said: Not your 2013 or 2014 Seahawks either. That offensive line is the worst. They used to just suck at pass blocking. Now they suck at everything. my thoughts exactly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.