Jump to content

This Aint Packers Talk v69


CWood21

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, packfanfb said:

In other news LOL

 

This disappoints me. I may not like everything Barstool does or stands for, but Dave Portnoy's a great businessman and his pizza reviews are hilarious.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Norm said:

YOU

*******

 

*******S

 

 

SHUT

 

 

THE

 

****

 

 

UP

 

13 minutes ago, Norm said:

Both of you should be ran over by a steam roller on live TV for my enjoyment

I'll drive

 

11 minutes ago, Norm said:

No. You suck too.

You all suck.

 

11 minutes ago, Norm said:

So do you dumbass

 

Dumbass isn't censored

@Packerraymond is a dumbass

Nice

69

420

 

Knock it off or warnings and bans will be next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, packfanfb said:

A lot of that wouldn't be admissible even if it did exist.

Maybe yes....maybe no....depending on the nature of that (potential) evidence and judicial review as to relevance in the case brought.

If proof of "intent" is required by the law.....past bias and actions could be deemed relevant by the presiding judge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...