Ragnarok Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Just now, jrry32 said: Psh. You won by 15. We won by 39. You faced a bum named Brady. We faced a god named Tolzien. It's clear who the best was this week. I'm a Packers fan. So...they won by 15. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrashMan510 Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 6 minutes ago, Nodisrespect said: 1:30 am ET and football is just ending, kinda ridiculous. Stupid baseball and the sf giants-dodgers is gonna start in 20 minutes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheVillain112 Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Just now, Oregon Ducks said: Most competitive QB in the league...check Deep WR corps...check Top young RB in the league...check Best TE unit...check Best pass rushing duo...check Beast D Line...check No fly zone DBs...check All you need is Chip Kelly, and we might as well hand you the Lombardi... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
game3525 Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Just now, Xenos said: 2009 was the last time I can remember. But yeah, we have had some memorable losses. All close games if memory serves me right. It is amazing. 2010-The Chiefs ST and a monsoon. 2012-We did beat Oakland in week 1 2013-We blew a 21 point lead 2014-Lost by one point 2017-Blocked FG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrry32 Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Just now, Ragnarok said: I'm a Packers fan. So...they won by 15. I apologize. I thought you were a fan of the second best team in the NFL, not a team that couldn't crack 20 points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul-mac Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 7 minutes ago, Oregon Ducks said: We looked like the best team in the NFL in week 1 and didn't play our best. I'm good. Plus, we haven't even played at home. You can't top 30K RABID, HUNGRY, BOLTS FANS! I'll have some of what you're smoking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oregon Ducks Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Just now, TheVillain112 said: All you need is Chip Kelly, and we might as well hand you the Lombardi... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thelonebillsfan Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 God the memes I shall get to use thanks to this kicker. Thank you based Chargers for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thelonebillsfan Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 I can never really tell if OD is just trying to troll really badly or if he is that wrapped up in his own crazy. Probably a little of A and a little of B. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 2 minutes ago, jrry32 said: I apologize. I thought you were a fan of the second best team in the NFL, not a team that couldn't crack 20 points. You mean, a team that didn't need to exert themselves to score more than 20 points. It was long term strategy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OakRaiders3828 Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 11 minutes ago, Oregon Ducks said: We looked like the best team in the NFL in week 1 and didn't play our best. I'm good. Plus, we haven't even played at home. You can't top 30K RABID, HUNGRY, BOLTS FANS! Just because the stadium holds 30k, doesn't mean that 30k will be there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheVillain112 Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 2 minutes ago, Thelonebillsfan said: I can never really tell if OD is just trying to troll really badly or if he is that wrapped up in his own crazy. Probably a little of A and a little of B. We don't talk about other posters here. But definitely A... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmad Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Still not as bad as the 4th and 29 nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrashMan510 Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 championCHIP da gawd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr LBC Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 7 minutes ago, Xenos said: To be fair, one of the turnovers covered for the one that Casey should have gotten in the first quarter. And the other covered for the backwards pass that Siemian made in the first half that rightfully should have been ruled a fumble when the pass was broken up (because it was a backwards pass). Broncos played like the better team for 3 1/4 quarters and deserved the win. But they also got the lion's share of the favorable calls from the refs (I don't think Roby intentionally hooked Allen on the play resulting in the INT, but he stepped on his foot, stumbled, and reached out grabbing KA to steady himself and did hook him, thus altering Allen's path which by rule is DPI if the ball is in the air). All that said, if the league is actually serious about player safety (we know they're not, but let's pretend for a second they are), the icing the kicker rule needs some serious amendment. It needs to be made to where once the players are set (or the ball is set/touched by the LS), you can no longer call the TO. You want to use the time out to make the kicker think about the kick and try and put pressure on him that way? Cool. But the way it's used now, it basically forces the kicker to kick the FG twice for it to count once and it forces players to go through a full contact rep that has absolutely no consequence on the game but can still result in player injury. That's a pretty crap thing, particularly to ST guys who are generally the ones making the league minimum and biting and scratching for jobs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.