Sugashane Posted November 18, 2019 Share Posted November 18, 2019 38 minutes ago, big_palooka said: That's what I am saying. Why would you 100 mil for a defensive player and have him play coverage. Mack's been getting doubles since his sophomore season and he always excelled in effecting the game. And the Raiders had nothing around him. Just doesn't make sense what's going on and he looks completely uninterested right now. Ah. I misunderstood you then. Ditto on all counts. Lol. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Felt really good beating y’all after last year. #NOCAP with that said. I hope you guys find your QB because that d is being wasted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WindyCity Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 6 hours ago, ITS_RAMMY_PLAYBOI said: Felt really good beating y’all after last year. #NOCAP with that said. I hope you guys find your QB because that d is being wasted. We hope you find your QB as well. Best wishes. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 1 hour ago, WindyCity said: We hope you find your QB as well. Best wishes. That’s funny. Almost as good as the 14-2 prediction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heinz D. Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 33 minutes ago, ITS_RAMMY_PLAYBOI said: That’s funny. Almost as good as the 14-2 prediction. You're saying Windy predicted 14-2? Are you feeling all right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abstract_thought Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Watching replay/breakdown of this game and I wanted to point out an obvious flaw with the running game: Nobody respects the keep option on the RPO plays. Mitch could literally run for miles on some of these plays with the way the defense flows to the playside. Is this a case of reads being pre-determined or Mitch just reading the play incorrectly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nads786 Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 6 hours ago, ITS_RAMMY_PLAYBOI said: That’s funny. Almost as good as the 14-2 prediction. Goff sucks dude. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WindyCity Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 15 hours ago, ITS_RAMMY_PLAYBOI said: That’s funny. Almost as good as the 14-2 prediction. I would never predict Bears success, you are barking up the wrong tree on that one. Sorry for breaking Goff last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topwop1 Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 15 hours ago, ITS_RAMMY_PLAYBOI said: That’s funny. Almost as good as the 14-2 prediction. What's funny is your favorite team is paying Jared Goof $30M+ for the next 3 years at the very least Talk about a dumb decision Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malagabears Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 (edited) Welp, Nagy is gonna keep rolling with Bustcuit until we really embarrass ourselves. Edited November 21, 2019 by malagabears Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topwop1 Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 6 minutes ago, malagabears said: Welp, Nagy is gonna keep rolling with Bustcuit until we really embarrass ourselves. I don't see the point of not playing him at this point. We are not going to the playoffs and Chase Daniel is likely gone after this season. If Mitch is going to turn around his career then he needs to play. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WindyCity Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Playing Daniel is pointless. Play Mitch and see what happens. Rewatched the first half of the Rams game and it was his best play of the season. Charles Leno needs to be replaced. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEAR FACE DOWN ARROW Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Yeah, so we start Daniels so we have a lower risk QB executing the same busted offense? No thanks. At least be damn sure when you figure out he's not ever going to get it. Daniel needs to split next off season; he's spendy for a backup, has no upside, and his coach-on-the-bench schtick hasn't netted anythign so why keep it up? We're going to see a veteran for competition and hopefully some rookie or Rosen in the QB room. I'm all for taking a risk with a low value pick or trade to see if we can't get lucky, since, you know, we've never been lucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topwop1 Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 13 minutes ago, RunningVaccs said: Yeah, so we start Daniels so we have a lower risk QB executing the same busted offense? No thanks. At least be damn sure when you figure out he's not ever going to get it. Daniel needs to split next off season; he's spendy for a backup, has no upside, and his coach-on-the-bench schtick hasn't netted anythign so why keep it up? We're going to see a veteran for competition and hopefully some rookie or Rosen in the QB room. I'm all for taking a risk with a low value pick or trade to see if we can't get lucky, since, you know, we've never been lucky. Hopefully not Rosen. Give it up man lol he sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 10 hours ago, Nads786 said: Goff sucks dude. Lol. That’s funny. Try winning a playoff game before attacking a stablished winning qb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts