beardown3231 Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 Packers 26-20 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugashane Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 (edited) Aaron Rodgers collarbone health - 1 of 2 Can we sign Shea McClellin for a 1 game contract? Edited December 9, 2019 by Sugashane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malak1 Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 We can win this game....but we won’t. Mitch plays like trash against GB. Actually, all Chicago QBs play like trash against GB for the last 2 decades. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WindyCity Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 14 minutes ago, malak1 said: We can win this game....but we won’t. Mitch plays like trash against GB. Actually, all Chicago QBs play like trash against GB for the last 2 decades. He had a really nice game against them last season in week 15. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nads786 Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 2 minutes ago, WindyCity said: He had a really nice game against them last season in week 15. He played solid but we didn't blow them out as we should have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nads786 Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 Vegas has the Packers as either a 7 or 5 point favorite against the Bears. I guess they aren't buying our three game win streak. I think Packers win 23-20 in a close game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEAR FACE DOWN ARROW Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 (edited) This team... predicting their games is just a big shrug. They looked great last week, and seem to be improving, but then again they have enthusiastically sucked balls for most of the season... I think the offense comes back to earth but the defense steps up and they find a way to win and keep my idiot playoff hopes alive. Bears 19 Packers 17. Including a missed XP My attendance at a trade show is contingent on the Bears being OUT of the playoffs, and people are getting really upset with me when I say we have a 96% chance of attending. Edited December 9, 2019 by RunningVaccs 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chisoxguy7 Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 Bears take it, 27-24. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nads786 Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 How in shape with Hicks be going into this game? I'm hoping his conditioning isn't a problem and we can use him on 60% of snaps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epyon Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 (edited) Bears need this game more than the pack does..... BUT The teams we've beaten are all bottom feeders this year, and our OL has been getting consistently "big brother-ed" by the Pack DL recently...... and Mitch gets jumpy when consistently pressured and/or the running game stalls forcing him to rely on his arm... Furthermore, I think GB will be smart enough to dare Mitch to play the underneath game and just wait for him to make mistakes. Detroit bombed playing man instead of zone, and Dallas kept letting us throw deeper (though given Mitches' downfield accuracy that wasn't exactly a terrible plan). If Prince isn't back, I see them making more big plays than we do, while forcing Mitch to try and play the Brees/Brady/Peyton game of methodically beating them in the short game, which I just don't see Mitch doing... THAT BEING SAID.... I think the right side of our OL is better than it was at the start of the season (Long/Massie both being gone), Wims over Gabriel can be a big factor (particularly if we really do need to use more short game), and we finally found some damn TEs who can actually impact the game.... so there's some hope. My gut says 60% chance of packers win, and I could see it being a double digit loss if everything goes poorly for the offense, or at most a 7point spread on a bears win.... Rodgers is too clutch to blow them out. I think we need at least 28 points to take this game. Edited December 9, 2019 by Epyon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beardown3231 Posted December 9, 2019 Author Share Posted December 9, 2019 17 minutes ago, Epyon said: Bears need this game more than the pack does..... BUT The teams we've beaten are all bottom feeders this year, and our OL has been getting consistently "big brother-ed" by the Pack DL recently...... and Mitch gets jumpy when consistently pressured and/or the running game stalls forcing him to rely on his arm... Furthermore, I think GB will be smart enough to dare Mitch to play the underneath game and just wait for him to make mistakes. Detroit bombed playing man instead of zone, and Dallas kept letting us throw deeper (though given Mitches' downfield accuracy that wasn't exactly a terrible plan). If Prince isn't back, I see them making more big plays than we do, while forcing Mitch to try and play the Brees/Brady/Peyton game of methodically beating them in the short game, which I just don't see Mitch doing... THAT BEING SAID.... I think the right side of our OL is better than it was at the start of the season (Long/Massie both being gone), Wims over Gabriel can be a big factor (particularly if we really do need to use more short game), and we finally found some damn TEs who can actually impact the game.... so there's some hope. My gut says 60% chance of packers win, and I could see it being a double digit loss if everything goes poorly for the offense, or at most a 7point spread on a bears win.... Rodgers is too clutch to blow them out. I think we need at least 28 points to take this game. Is Z.Smith going to play? He left the WASH game early. Looked like he hit his knee pretty hard, maybe like a bad bruise or something. I wouldn't say they've been big-brothered by the Packers' DL "recently." They lost week 1 but it's not like week 14 or whatever last year was a big performance from their DL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TB 1 Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 1 hour ago, Epyon said: Bears need this game more than the pack does..... BUT The teams we've beaten are all bottom feeders this year, and our OL has been getting consistently "big brother-ed" by the Pack DL recently...... and Mitch gets jumpy when consistently pressured and/or the running game stalls forcing him to rely on his arm... Furthermore, I think GB will be smart enough to dare Mitch to play the underneath game and just wait for him to make mistakes. Detroit bombed playing man instead of zone, and Dallas kept letting us throw deeper (though given Mitches' downfield accuracy that wasn't exactly a terrible plan). If Prince isn't back, I see them making more big plays than we do, while forcing Mitch to try and play the Brees/Brady/Peyton game of methodically beating them in the short game, which I just don't see Mitch doing... THAT BEING SAID.... I think the right side of our OL is better than it was at the start of the season (Long/Massie both being gone), Wims over Gabriel can be a big factor (particularly if we really do need to use more short game), and we finally found some damn TEs who can actually impact the game.... so there's some hope. My gut says 60% chance of packers win, and I could see it being a double digit loss if everything goes poorly for the offense, or at most a 7point spread on a bears win.... Rodgers is too clutch to blow them out. I think we need at least 28 points to take this game. The Packers can be beaten if the Bears play as well as a capable. Green Bay didn't exactly dominate a bad Washington team. Green Bay is a very weak 10-3 team. They are more like a 8-5 team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beardown3231 Posted December 10, 2019 Author Share Posted December 10, 2019 1 hour ago, TB 1 said: The Packers can be beaten if the Bears play as well as a capable. Green Bay didn't exactly dominate a bad Washington team. Green Bay is a very weak 10-3 team. They are more like a 8-5 team. It wouldn't be a December without their dopey fan base crushing their sure fire, first ballot HOF QB despite a well-above .500 record. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafreak Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 Mitch lights them up and says after the game that "we wanted to make them play defense".... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beardown3231 Posted December 10, 2019 Author Share Posted December 10, 2019 19 minutes ago, dafreak said: Mitch lights them up and says after the game that "we wanted to make them play defense".... Or uses the word "lost" a lot since around Halloween Zadarius Smith tweeted a photoshopped picture and faintly in the background there was a photo of Trubisky on a tree and it said "lost" above it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.