true2form Posted December 28, 2019 Share Posted December 28, 2019 5 minutes ago, drfrey13 said: Placing any blame is an assumption. Maybe Gafford was told just to run up the sideline without looking back. What you do not have to assume is that there is a flaw there and it could be Gruden, Carr, and/or Gafford. No you're assuming he wasn't just a decoy and you're assuming nothing was said to him if he did screw up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drfrey13 Posted December 28, 2019 Share Posted December 28, 2019 3 hours ago, true2form said: No you're assuming he wasn't just a decoy and you're assuming nothing was said to him if he did screw up. That is a part of what I just said. You are also assuming he was a a decoy with your statement. It is all assumption. The only thing is that is not an assumption is that an opportunity was missed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.