Jump to content
DudeWhat???

The only change we need maybe in the front office

Recommended Posts

By mid season..the decision to go on with out a more viable option then mason and duck was disastrous,  irresponsible,  and ridiculous.  Based on the power structure of our team..that's front office territory... 

Edited by DudeWhat???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you don't think the starting QB wasn't the coaches decision I don't know what to tell you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because viable starting QB's grow on trees, especially mid-season...

Colbert has given Tomlin top level talent or at least playoff level talent throughout his tenure as head coach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....like who? Mark Sanchez? Brock Ostwiler? Tom Savage? 

I think 3 examples is enough. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SwoleXmad said:

If you don't think the starting QB wasn't the coaches decision I don't know what to tell you. 

I didnt say that.. it's not his decision fully on who to bring in terms of competition.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dcash4 said:

....like who? Mark Sanchez? Brock Ostwiler? Tom Savage? 

I think 3 examples is enough. 

Brock would have definitely got us more wins..that's not even an opinion.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, FourThreeMafia said:

None of the QBs available would have taken us much futher, if any, than what we had.

Yes.. brock definitely would have.. I think people are unaware at just how inept our Offense was.. even though it should be obvious given the circumstances.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DudeWhat??? said:

Brock would have definitely got us more wins..that's not even an opinion.  

....if you don’t think that’s an opinion, you have clearly never watched the guy play. 

Remember: he was so bad a team traded A DRAFT PICK just to get rid of him to a team with cap space so they could cut him because they actually didn’t want him either. 

No, he wouldn’t have been better and we wouldn’t have been any better off. He woulda came in off the street and known nothing of our offense, not playing live ball, and would have taken weeks to get up to speed, just to come in and Be bad. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, DudeWhat??? said:

Yes.. brock definitely would have.. I think people are unaware at just how inept our Offense was.. even though it should be obvious given the circumstances.  

Osweiler DEFINITELY would have?   Based on what?

I wouldnt have been completely opposed to giving him a try, but he is not a good QB either.  Factor in poor OLine play, a limited running game, inconsistent weapons at WR and TE and some laughably bad offensive playcalling, and there is nothing to support that he would DEFINITELY be better.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, CKSteeler said:

Because viable starting QB's grow on trees, especially mid-season...

Colbert has given Tomlin top level talent or at least playoff level talent throughout his tenure as head coach.

Football given for the first statement.

Football retracted for the second statement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, FourThreeMafia said:

Osweiler DEFINITELY would have?   Based on what?

I wouldnt have been completely opposed to giving him a try, but he is not a good QB either.  Factor in poor OLine play, a limited running game, inconsistent weapons at WR and TE and some laughably bad offensive playcalling, and there is nothing to support that he would DEFINITELY be better.  

Based on his overall stats..his flashed were more sustained then anything mason or duck could have done... brock osweiler is only an example... there was Hogan, josh Johnson,  Kaepernick, cassel...mcCown...etc

 

http://www.nfl.com/player/brockosweiler/2533436/careerstats

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who was the more viable option? Miami wasnt giving up Fitzmagic because Rosen is trash.

The Bengals would probably have asked a fairly high cost for Dalton even though he might not have been worth it.

KC and Washington were not giving up their backups, they needed up needing them this season. So tell me, please who in the hell was Colbert supposed to go get?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, wwhickok said:

Who was the more viable option? Miami wasnt giving up Fitzmagic because Rosen is trash.

The Bengals would probably have asked a fairly high cost for Dalton even though he might not have been worth it.

KC and Washington were not giving up their backups, they needed up needing them this season. So tell me, please who in the hell was Colbert supposed to go get?

 

WHY DIDN’T STUPID MIKE TOMLIN AND KNOW-NOTHING COLBERT SIGN BRETT FAVRE?!?!?! IF I WAS THE GM THINGS WOULD BE DIFFERENT AROUND HERE! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×