CWood21 Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 6 hours ago, RaidersAreOne said: Is that close to enough? Seems extremely low. According to the TVC, yes. But the reality is that the Lions are likely drafting two tiers below where they currently are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefs_5627 Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 Chiefs after Ruggs? 😲 https://www.google.com/amp/s/profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/04/20/chiefs-may-try-to-trade-up-for-henry-ruggs/amp/ We only have 5 picks (1-5rnds) this year so unless Veach wants to throw something from next year in, or a player, idk what ammo we'd have to make it work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twslhs20 Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 7 minutes ago, Chiefs_5627 said: Chiefs after Ruggs? 😲 https://www.google.com/amp/s/profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/04/20/chiefs-may-try-to-trade-up-for-henry-ruggs/amp/ We only have 5 picks (1-5rnds) this year so unless Veach wants to throw something from next year in, or a player, idk what ammo we'd have to make it work. Chris Jones Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmare Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 2 hours ago, .Buzz said: I like Walter & Charlie for their draft analysis, but considering nobody else seems to have heard about this, I doubt there’s anything to this story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jtownsfine5t Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 Jaguars, Raiders are talking about a Yannick Ngakoue trade; source says the Jaguars currently "want too much" for Ngakoue From pro football talk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 6 hours ago, .Buzz said: If I'm the Jaguars, I'm taking that deal. They've severed that relationship and he will be a major distraction for them. Oakland gets a proven Pro Bowl DL in his prime, and JAX gets to recoup some value for a player that they won't re-sign anyway. They're dreaming if they think they're getting a better deal than that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 9 hours ago, sdrawkcab321 said: We’ve got stars as in celebrities. Not field production. We lead in the league in commercials/losses ratio. Back to Back to Back dual Offseason/Preseason Champs bro! We're going for the FOURPEAT. #2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyguy1609 Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soflbillsfan Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 9 hours ago, Chiefs_5627 said: Chiefs after Ruggs? 😲 https://www.google.com/amp/s/profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/04/20/chiefs-may-try-to-trade-up-for-henry-ruggs/amp/ We only have 5 picks (1-5rnds) this year so unless Veach wants to throw something from next year in, or a player, idk what ammo we'd have to make it work. But why? I know there are rumors but this isnt madden you can only have so many players on the field, watkins hunt, hardman, and kelce. Ruggs would be an extreme luxury and they need to fill other holes that need to be fixed. Trading up picks wouldnt be ideal no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fresh Prince Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, flyguy1609 said: Imagine if you just lost a extra game or two knowing what QB was out there with the 1st pick. Not they have to waste picks to get him. Edited April 23, 2020 by Fresh Prince Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tetsujin Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 1 hour ago, flyguy1609 said: Sounds right Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 20 minutes ago, Tetsujin said: Sounds right Take Andrew Thomas (or their LT of choice) at 3, and then maybe make a small move up from 18? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tetsujin Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 2 minutes ago, CWood21 said: Take Andrew Thomas (or their LT of choice) at 3, and then maybe make a small move up from 18? I hope we're not trading up for an OT. Is Thomas so much better than Wirfs/Becton/Wills, we should give up assets for him? That move could look absolutely awful in a year or two. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKnight82 Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 10 hours ago, .Buzz said: Why would you dump Mack then trade a first for an inferior player who wants a massive contract? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.