Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
aceinthehouse

Hypothetical trade: Redskins & Broncos

Recommended Posts

We are having Prelimary trade talks at the moment. We would like to get a feel for what your interest might be in a player.

We are interested in trading you OLB/DE Ryan Kerrigan to you.

We understand, you guys have (3) 3rd round draft choices. Specifically,  #15, #18 &#31 in the 3rd round.

We would like to trade you Pro Bowler Ryan Kerrigan for any of the (2) 3rd rounders you currently have.

You are welcome to make a counter offer, if you have interest, but unsure of the price.

Good luck & hope we can do business on this (hypothetical) trade.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Easy pass.   Kerrigan is 31, and a 1-year contract left at 11.5M before hitting UFA.   DEN's movement is about youth, and we're not yet 1-player away contenders.

DEN probably wouldn't even do it for a single 3rd.  2 is dreaming.    This scenario is less likely than the "Guice is running for 2K yards in 2019" thread.   

Edited by Broncofan
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see the need nor fit for Kerrigan. Doesn't seem to have the size for a 3-4 DE in Fangio's scheme, we already have Chubb, Von, Reed, Attachou and Holland at OLB so it doersn't seem like the fit is there, even hypothetically. And as Broncofan pointed out, we're looking for youth, Kerrigan is already 31, makes more money than his productional worth and isn't worth 2 #3's even if he did make the NFC Pro Bowl (which seems more on name than production).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you were talkin' Scherff or Williams we'd have stuff to chat about. 

OLB? Not a chance. IMO the strongest deepest position on the roster. Who exactly would he replace as a starter, Von Miller or Bradley Chubb? Got some really good backups also.

 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I don't see why Denver would trade any draft capital for Kerrigan. Miller and Chubb alone mean Kerrigan is unnecessary, plus we have depth behind them.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...