RuskieTitan Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 3 minutes ago, Xmad said: replace portland's owner. I second the motion. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pheltzbahr Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 36 minutes ago, Ragnarok said: @PR @MD4L @Jlash @Counselor @Pickle Rick @The Orca @SirA1 @pheltzbahr @Whicker @WFLukic @wwhickok @bcb1213 @RuskieTitan @TedLavie @Xmad If you have a proposal you would like to officially put forward for the opt-out, please quote this post with your fully typed out proposal. Then we can take the quoted messages and copy-paste them into a new voting thread. I'll make a new voting thread in about 48 hours to give everyone time. Pheltz proposal - Every owner has the choice to either eat the salary of the player opting out or to toll the players contract for one year. If you choose to toll, you will receive a cap hit of 350 or 150 based on what the player's RL hit is. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 42 minutes ago, pheltzbahr said: Pheltz proposal - Every owner has the choice to either eat the salary of the player opting out or to toll the players contract for one year. If you choose to toll, you will receive a cap hit of 350 or 150 based on what the player's RL hit is. Im voting this btw 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 8 hours ago, pheltzbahr said: Pheltz proposal - Every owner has the choice to either eat the salary of the player opting out or to toll the players contract for one year. If you choose to toll, you will receive a cap hit of 350 or 150 based on what the player's RL hit is. I second this proposal. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 Pay 50% of salary down to 501 Also I'd highly suggest locking anyone on the other proposal so it doesn't become a free sub 500 cut/three down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 1 hour ago, bcb1213 said: Pay 50% of salary down to 501 Also I'd highly suggest locking anyone on the other proposal so it doesn't become a free sub 500 cut/three down Does the contract toll? Does it run as normal? Just so we don't have to do this later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 6 minutes ago, Jlash said: Does the contract toll? Does it run as normal? Just so we don't have to do this later. We'll make it owners choice seeing how that's popular Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 Just now, bcb1213 said: We'll make it owners choice seeing how that's popular It should be a discussion that leads to a decision. Here is a serious question, who is actually in charge in this lg? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 13 minutes ago, wwhickok said: It should be a discussion that leads to a decision. Here is a serious question, who is actually in charge in this lg? Lololol You mean like I was trying to do in the other thread by breaking it down and ya'll were like nope Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 58 minutes ago, bcb1213 said: We'll make it owners choice seeing how that's popular Are they locked on the roster? Are they free to be moved? Stop being so difficult and start being specific. I don't know what your deal is, but it's childish. 57 minutes ago, wwhickok said: It should be a discussion that leads to a decision. Here is a serious question, who is actually in charge in this lg? 42 minutes ago, bcb1213 said: Lololol You mean like I was trying to do in the other thread by breaking it down and ya'll were like nope It's been discussed. Submit your FULL proposals, we'll vote on FULL proposals. A couple weeks ago everyone started bringing forth proposals, they outlined them. Now there's a handful of people who either don't remember them, or are trying to mix and match. If you liked different parts of different proposals, then put it all together and we'll vote on it. We don't need to be this fragmented. And WW to answer your question, no one is in "charge" of the league. That's why the majority has to vote on changes. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 1 hour ago, Jlash said: Are they locked on the roster? Are they free to be moved? Stop being so difficult and start being specific. I don't know what your deal is, but it's childish. It's been discussed. Submit your FULL proposals, we'll vote on FULL proposals. A couple weeks ago everyone started bringing forth proposals, they outlined them. Now there's a handful of people who either don't remember them, or are trying to mix and match. If you liked different parts of different proposals, then put it all together and we'll vote on it. We don't need to be this fragmented. And WW to answer your question, no one is in "charge" of the league. That's why the majority has to vote on changes. Well mine was on the list. 50% salary down to 501. The other parts can be discussed. That's the whole reason I wanted to put it in small increments in the first place. Maybe people like one part but not another. It's dumb to have that the proposal has to be all three or four of these things or none of it imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuskieTitan Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 12 minutes ago, bcb1213 said: Well mine was on the list. 50% salary down to 501. The other parts can be discussed. That's the whole reason I wanted to put it in small increments in the first place. Maybe people like one part but not another. It's dumb to have that the proposal has to be all three or four of these things or none of it imo Why not just add those different scenarios as different proposals? I would not liked to get 'locked' into one potential scenario just based on how I viewed the first part of the proposal and not the whole act. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 24 minutes ago, RuskieTitan said: Why not just add those different scenarios as different proposals? I would not liked to get 'locked' into one potential scenario just based on how I viewed the first part of the proposal and not the whole act. Can do that too but it leads to like a dozen options to vote on instead of like four Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 (edited) I think all opt outs that a contract is decreased should be locked. This gives wiggle room for teams that choose to not toll the contract to trade the player while those that choose to toll have committed to keeping the contract until next off-season. Edited August 21, 2020 by PR 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 56 minutes ago, RuskieTitan said: I would not liked to get 'locked' into one potential scenario just based on how I viewed the first part of the proposal and not the whole act. This is how I feel as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts