VigilantZombie Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 1 minute ago, EaglesPeteC said: I know I’m new here so someone explain that Carson Wentz trade to me like I’m 5, cuz I don’t get it..... a franchise QB (although one in a slump), plus 2 picks for a 32 year old DE???? Does not compute. This is completely how I feel I don't understand this trade at all if anything Hungry should have been giving up pics with Brandon Graham there is no way This is a fair trade this is the same league that vetoed the Patrick mahomes Jackson trade and somehow This one is more fair? I mean I feel get what J lash is saying about it And I know I said I agreed with him but the more I think about it I don't think that I do 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 2 minutes ago, Counselor said: It’s a pretty bad trade but with how Wentz has been playing it doesn’t unfairly affect the competitive balance of the league imo. I think with out the picks, we could all see it 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EaglesPeteC Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 Once again new here but not one for vetoing any trade that two people agree to but yikes.....I don’t get it. Talking about selling an asset at an absolute low point and to a buyer that desperately needed that asset. Yikes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 Well Frogs can veto it. He is the last member on the trade council since the trade was between two of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 2 minutes ago, EaglesPeteC said: Once again new here but not one for vetoing any trade that two people agree to but yikes.....I don’t get it. Talking about selling an asset at an absolute low point and to a buyer that desperately needed that asset. Yikes Sucks. You could've thrown him TY Hilton and got Wentz AND picks back. You missed out big time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 Just now, Counselor said: Well Frogs can veto it. He is the last member on the trade council since the trade was between two of them. I don't think it's veto-able though, honestly. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 2 minutes ago, Jlash said: I don't think it's veto-able though, honestly. I agree but yet people are thinking it should. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rackcs Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 41 minutes ago, bcb1213 said: You literally just said you won't vote for a four wr lineup. So yes I consider that biased That's not what biased means. I also didn't say never, I said I almost always vote against them. I didn't just say 4 WR bad, I explained how I think it makes an offense predictable as a base alignment and therefore can easily be defended against. I know you said you were going to do other things in the gameplan but I didn't think it was going to be enough to counteract how predictable your offense would be most of the time. Again, all valid feedback and criticism of choosing to play with a 4 WR base offense without a strong RB, but apparently that's just me being biased. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 8 minutes ago, EaglesPeteC said: Once again new here but not one for vetoing any trade that two people agree to but yikes.....I don’t get it. Talking about selling an asset at an absolute low point and to a buyer that desperately needed that asset. Yikes I get what you're saying but I you have to look at you'd have to pay Wentz his outrageous contract tp keep him past this seasons tho too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 (edited) Chiefs in final three for bell. Might have nailed this one Edited October 15, 2020 by bcb1213 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 5 minutes ago, bcb1213 said: Chiefs in final three for bell. Might have nailed this one No waivers? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 6 minutes ago, bcb1213 said: I get what you're saying but I you have to look at you'd have to pay Wentz his outrageous contract tp keep him past this seasons tho too A bad train is a bad trade And as far as Carson went needing to be paid OK but Brandon Graham is awesome on the last year of his contract and is far less valuable than a franchise quarterback Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EaglesPeteC Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 13 minutes ago, Jlash said: Sucks. You could've thrown him TY Hilton and got Wentz AND picks back. You missed out big time. I know right..... meh it is what it is 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 1 minute ago, Counselor said: No waivers? It'll get done when I get to a computer. In a huge conference this morning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 1 minute ago, bcb1213 said: It'll get done when I get to a computer. In a huge conference this morning Can I attend the conference? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts