Jump to content

AFC Championship Titans@Chiefs


x0x

Who you got?  

154 members have voted

  1. 1. 2020 AFC Champion Is?

    • Kansas City Chiefs
      83
    • Tennessee Titans
      71


Recommended Posts

Just now, TitanLegend said:

 

Have you guys seen the holes the o-line has opened for him over the 2nd half of the season?

Henry is a fantastic runner. There's no taking that away from him. Incredible after contact.

But the o-line is giving him the first 4-5 yards free at a rather high rate.

Dude, Henry has went on a historic run and has had one of the best seasons we've seen from a RB.

You may be able to run the ball without him, but taking away an elite top shelf RB will indeed be a big hit to the offense and put more pressure on Tanny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jrry32 said:

Him looking back late made it more questionable than it is. But the NFL needs to consider changes. Underthrown deep balls should not result in DPI 75% of the time.

On one hand I agree. On the other I'm unsure how to adjust the rules to fix it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TitanLegend said:

Sure.

But as many good RBs that come in to the NFL each year, I'm willing to take my chances trying to find one before paying one 13 mil a year.

That's a heck of a risk to take when you're a game away from the Super Bowl right now and relying on Ryan Tannehill. $13 million is a bargain for a top skill player. It's a bargain for a player who gave your offense 1500+ yards and 15+ TDs this year.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, .Buzz said:

Dude, Henry has went on a historic run and has had one of the best seasons we've seen from a RB.

You may be able to run the ball without him, but taking away an elite top shelf RB will indeed be a big hit to the offense and put more pressure on Tanny.

Which do you think has been better this season, CMac or Henry?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jakuvious said:

Physics don't work that way. When you're running full speed, there's no jumping backwards. He stopped, he didn't start moving back towards the line.

So...you're saying Hill was still and the CB just ran into him? Hill was NOT attempting to move back towards the ball, he was just standing stock still?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChazStandard said:

Except you can't interfere if you don't initiate contact, in that sense it was cut and dry.

They have consistently called PI on DBs when the ball is under thrown and the WR tries to go back for the ball. I hate it, but that is how they call it. 

As for overturning a PI call. They have only overturned PI calls under extremely blatant circumstances.(Think Saints Rams game) Even if you want to argue that there wasn't PI here, which i'm fine with you arguing, its close enough that they wont overturn it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...