minutemancl Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 22 minutes ago, .Buzz said: This guy called the Daniel Jones pick last year, so he knows what he's talking about. This contradicts the Miami-Detroit trade deal though. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 1 minute ago, minutemancl said: This guy called the Daniel Jones pick last year, so he knows what he's talking about. This contradicts the Miami-Detroit trade deal though. Charles Robinson is great. He's definitely worth listening to (although as he prefaced who knows for sure, smokescreens happen). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minutemancl Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 3 minutes ago, .Buzz said: I agree totally with this. I'm still standing pat on Wills, but Wirfs wouldn't surprise me in the slightest. It would be disappointing a bit (I'm not as high on him as a lot of others here; if someone wants to sell me on why he can be an elite tackle in the NFL please do so), but not surprising. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HTTRDynasty Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 (edited) Not happening. Should've just tanked harder. No idea why Fitz was starting at the end of the season. Edited April 23, 2020 by HTTRDynasty 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minutemancl Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 2 minutes ago, HTTRDynasty said: Not happening. Should've just tanked harder. No idea why Fitz was starting at the end of the season. Tonight is gonna rule. Please let some of these rumors come true. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrubes20 Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 2 minutes ago, HTTRDynasty said: I like Burrow, but that's kind of gross. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minutemancl Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 I think it is moot because the Bengals won't take that deal, but should they? That's a pretty sweet haul. You can get Tua and a top OT. If you have Burrow and Tua close, you've got to consider it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingOfNewYork Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 That would take their other 2 firsts this year, 2021 first and 2022 first plus a couple mid round picks if I’m Detroit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingOfNewYork Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 If I’m Cincy then Tua+ is better than Burrow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 Justin Jefferson isn't making it past 20. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingOfNewYork Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 56 minutes ago, Forge said: Not without precedence either. Miami moved from 13 to 3 in 2013 at the cost of only a second. Because the Raiders were void of picks that year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Nix Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 9 minutes ago, HTTRDynasty said: Not happening. Should've just tanked harder. No idea why Fitz was starting at the end of the season. I would cry if this happened, but I’d understand. I still would turn it down if I were Cincy. Burrow is already a legend in the city and he hasn’t even been selected yet. I think it’s more risky to take the deal. Picking Burrow gets butts in seats which is what Mike Brown wants. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 4 minutes ago, KingOfTheDot said: Because the Raiders were void of picks that year. Yep, but it happened. So there's precedence (though I think I was wrong about the picks - it was 12 to 3, not 13 to 3) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.