Jump to content

Draft General (News, Media Mocks, Big Boards, Rumors)


goldfishwars

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, .Buzz said:

Yeah, I think he could slot in at WLB. I am seeing more and more people think he'd fit better in the safety/slot but I think he could play them all.

Comes down to where you think he'll excel the most.

I don't see why he couldn't be an ILB or even an MLB. Fred Warner was absolute crap at taking on blocks entering the draft. You can coach these kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jeezla said:

I don't see why he couldn't be an ILB or even an MLB. Fred Warner was absolute crap at taking on blocks entering the draft. You can coach these kids.

I'm sure you could get that out of him eventually. Feel like it's more so the argument of where does he fit most naturally/where will you get the best version of him?

We drafted Myles Jack who projected as a natural WLB and slotted him at MLB the last couple years because we thought the same thing. Now he's moving to WILL and we spent $8-$10M per to get a more natural fit with Schobert in there next to him.

I think if you want to draft Simmons and have him at his best safety or WILL is it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, .Buzz said:

I'm sure you could get that out of him eventually. Feel like it's more so just where does he hit most naturally/where will you get the best version of him.

We drafted Myles Jack who fit in as a natural WLB and have put him at MLB the last couple years. Now he's moving to WILL and we spend $8-$10M per to get a more natural fit with Schobert in there.

Think if you want to draft Simmons and have him at his best safety or WILL is it.

But that's just me.

If you want him to make an instant impact, you play him at those 2 spots. If you can be patient with him for a year, he can be an MLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jeezla said:

If you want him to make an instant impact, you play him at those 2 spots. If you can be patient with him for a year, he can be an MLB.

Outside of QB's (and at this point even that expectation appears to have shifted in the league), if you're selecting a player in the Top 5-6, you're doing it with the expectation that he'll be an instant impact.

Fred Warner learned to take on blocks.  Fred Warner was also taken in the 3rd round.  I'm not trying to compare Simmons to Curry here, but we're both old enough to remember Aaron Curry, the "safest pick in the 2009 draft."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Jeezla said:

If you want him to make an instant impact, you play him at those 2 spots. If you can be patient with him for a year, he can be an MLB.

After the Myles experiment, I'm not as sold on that, but I do think you're right in that he could eventually get there.

I also would've hated drafting Myles in the top 10 if the plan was to move him off a natural fit like WILL and not see an instant impact/that not work out like it has. You take the chance with Simmons that it happens. 

So imo, I don't think that's a smart idea for anyone taking him top 10, which is where he's going.

(I know Myles and Simmons aren't the same player, but moving a guy from a more natural position to another isn't seamless and things can go wrong. In the top 10, I'm not chancing that).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, .Buzz said:

After the Myles experiment, I'm not as sold on that, but I do think you're right in that he could eventually get there.

I also would've hated drafting Myles in the top 10 if the plan was to move him off a natural fit like WILL and not see an instant impact/that not work out like it has. You take the chance with Simmons that it happens. 

So imo, I don't think that's a smart idea for anyone taking him top 10, which is where he's going.

(I know Myles and Simmons aren't the same player, but moving a guy from a more natural position to another isn't seamless and things can go wrong. In the top 10, I'm not chancing that).

Couldn’t agree more. Like i get he is versatile but man let him be a beast at what he does before trying to turn him into a Madden player that can start any position if you force him there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, .Buzz said:

After the Myles experiment, I'm not as sold on that, but I do think you're right in that he could eventually get there.

I also would've hated drafting Myles in the top 10 if the plan was to move him off a natural fit like WILL and not see an instant impact/that not work out like it has. You take the chance with Simmons that it happens. 

So imo, I don't think that's a smart idea for anyone taking him top 10, which is where he's going.

(I know Myles and Simmons aren't the same player, but moving a guy from a more natural position to another isn't seamless and things can go wrong. In the top 10, I'm not chancing that).

You could have him play wlb year 1, then move him to mlb year 2 if he's showing added strength and take on/shed ability. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, The LBC said:

Paul Finnebaum from Rotoworld said 2 days ago that he has only one source in within the Chargers organization and that source has given him indications that they don't expect the team to draft a QB at #6.

It's going to blow if only one QB goes in the top 12 picks

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...