Jump to content

2020 Off-season Discussion Thread


squire12

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Kenrik said:

1. I thought they only gave out 32 comp picks? After cancellations Fackrell is on the bubble of us getting one. 

2. No chance on Goodson unless the Giants have him 3.5 million more than he's worth. 

I'd say we have 2 right now and a 4th and 5th seems right. 

Edited by Golfman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, skibrett15 said:

please please please don't sign tramon.

Yeah.  Terrible idea.  Sign the highest-graded defensive back on our team to a cheap *** deal where we won’t ever have to worry about the #4 WR on a team because our coach on the field DB ****s him down.  Terrible idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Outpost31 said:

Yeah.  Terrible idea.  Sign the highest-graded defensive back on our team to a cheap *** deal where we won’t ever have to worry about the #4 WR on a team because our coach on the field DB ****s him down.  Terrible idea.

Great idea to sign him as an assistant coach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Packers legitimately don't have much room to work with when you factor in all the salaries for the ERFAs and other low end guys, the draft pool, and the fact that it's irresponsible to go into the season without an emergency fund in case you need to sign a street guy.

Sure, they have the obvious "cut Lane Taylor" move to free up about $4.5m in space, but they might prefer to trade him for a late pick since that's still not a lot of space.

Last year was an anomaly because they had a bunch of money to play around with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PossibleCabbage said:

The Packers legitimately don't have much room to work with when you factor in all the salaries for the ERFAs and other low end guys, the draft pool, and the fact that it's irresponsible to go into the season without an emergency fund in case you need to sign a street guy.

Sure, they have the obvious "cut Lane Taylor" move to free up about $4.5m in space, but they might prefer to trade him for a late pick since that's still not a lot of space.

Last year was an anomaly because they had a bunch of money to play around with.

The cap savings on Taylor are exactly the same if you cut him or trade him. I'l all for trading him if you can find a dance partner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PossibleCabbage said:

The Packers legitimately don't have much room to work with when you factor in all the salaries for the ERFAs and other low end guys, the draft pool, and the fact that it's irresponsible to go into the season without an emergency fund in case you need to sign a street guy.

Sure, they have the obvious "cut Lane Taylor" move to free up about $4.5m in space, but they might prefer to trade him for a late pick since that's still not a lot of space.

Last year was an anomaly because they had a bunch of money to play around with.

Cutting and trading Taylor have the same cap implications.

There's 6 million to be gained by restructuring Z.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...