buno67 Posted February 6, 2020 Author Share Posted February 6, 2020 7 hours ago, naptownskinsfan said: I think in the beginning you will see a lot of movement. However, the end result may be what we are seeing now, and even less, because with free movement I think players will ultimately settle a little bit more. There will always be some grad transfers who move around chasing a deep run, or wanting to go to a specific coach to groom them for the draft, but a free movement system would really force coaches to be up front with players more instead of the risk of losing them and causing turnover in the program. That has a net negative in the end. Also, players will be more wary of transferring because they don't want to lose their spot, or waste their free chance to transfer early. Yeah exactly. It might be chaotic at first but it would settle down after a couple of years Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naptownskinsfan Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 The ACC has tagged into this with their support of one-time transfers without sitting out a year https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/acc-backs-big-ten-proposal-to-allow-every-athlete-a-one-time-transfer-without-sitting-out/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naptownskinsfan Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 The NCAA transfer committee working group is currently discussing this. Also going to change the thread title https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/28730763/ncaa-studies-idea-1-transfer-no-penalty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NateDawg Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 The less power and control the NCAA has, the better. The current selective system is a sham. Guys like Luke Ford getting their waivers denied last year. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 If coaches can dip whenever they want then there's no reason athletes shouldn't be able to as well. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeT14 Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 9 hours ago, NateDawg said: The less power and control the NCAA has, the better. The current selective system is a sham. Guys like Luke Ford getting their waivers denied last year. Agreed. Luke Ford and Brock Hoffman get absolutely shafted, while Tate Martell gets a waiver because.. well I can't figure it out except he's a prominent name. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyPhil1781 Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 3 hours ago, MikeT14 said: Agreed. Luke Ford and Brock Hoffman get absolutely shafted, while Tate Martell gets a waiver because.. well I can't figure it out except he's a prominent name. Tate getting immediate eligibility was due to the person who recruited him, Urban, left the college which grants the transfer the ability to play immediately as I understand it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeT14 Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 56 minutes ago, JTagg7754 said: Tate getting immediate eligibility was due to the person who recruited him, Urban, left the college which grants the transfer the ability to play immediately as I understand it. So did Brock if I understand correctly. Still didn’t work. (Even if this wasn’t the driving factor) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyPhil1781 Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 (edited) 53 minutes ago, MikeT14 said: So did Brock if I understand correctly. Still didn’t work. (Even if this wasn’t the driving factor) I didn't understand his story so I couldn't comment on it. I feel it's stated in the rules that if the person who recruited you leaves the program, you can transfer and have immediate eligibility. I'll have to look into his situation and see why he wouldn't be granted that if that was his reason for transferring. EDIT: First thing I Googled: "Hoffman transferred to Virginia Tech from Coastal Carolina and sought a waiver for immediate eligibility. It wasn't because he had lost a position battle, it wasn't because of a coaching change....." If his coach did leave and he didn't cite that for his primary reason for transferring, that's on him for not taking advantage of the rule. I understand and 100000000000% sympathize for his main reason for transferring but I'm not the NCAA so my opinion is garbage here lol Edited February 19, 2020 by JTagg7754 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mse326 Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 Remember guys they are only investigating this. I expect this to be a VERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRY long investigation 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyPhil1781 Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 11 minutes ago, mse326 said: Remember guys they are only investigating this. I expect this to be a VERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRY long investigation And I totally expect it to be. This will change the landscape of college football recruiting and I feel they need to be careful not to overlook anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buno67 Posted February 22, 2020 Author Share Posted February 22, 2020 On 2/19/2020 at 3:32 PM, mse326 said: Remember guys they are only investigating this. I expect this to be a VERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRY long investigation The NCAA as a whole is investigating it now. Conferences like the big10, have already done so. Might happen sooner because the conferences are already ahead of the NCAA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mse326 Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 32 minutes ago, buno67 said: The NCAA as a whole is investigating it now. Conferences like the big10, have already done so. Might happen sooner because the conferences are already ahead of the NCAA Nope. Because if they say they are done investigating they will have to make a decision. As long as they are "still investigating" they can pretend the care and are doing something without actually doing something. It won't take long by necessity, but desire. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naptownskinsfan Posted March 29, 2020 Share Posted March 29, 2020 NCAA pushing the vote back for this from April to June due to Covid19 https://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/03/28/report-vote-to-make-all-transfers-immediately-eligible-pushed-back-two-months/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mse326 Posted March 29, 2020 Share Posted March 29, 2020 52 minutes ago, naptownskinsfan said: NCAA pushing the vote back for this from April to June due to Covid19 https://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/03/28/report-vote-to-make-all-transfers-immediately-eligible-pushed-back-two-months/ On 2/21/2020 at 10:07 PM, mse326 said: Nope. Because if they say they are done investigating they will have to make a decision. As long as they are "still investigating" they can pretend the care and are doing something without actually doing something. It won't take long by necessity, but desire. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpeg.e8eaa7b111d04855851cb27ee40fe6b5.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.