GW21 Posted August 14, 2020 Share Posted August 14, 2020 1 hour ago, 757-NINER said: If true, that is very interesting. Most of the fanbase had kind of written him off, me included. I personally thought he just didn't fit that Seattle scheme and was more of a 5T. I was ready to cash-in a draft pick for him. Crazy how one coach can see something totally different from another. But I do agree, he's looked much more effective as a penetrator than as a gap controller. Agreed. I think most of us were pretty much over him. I'd be curious as to how Jim Washburn would know this. I guess Kocurek and him overlapped in Detroit for a couple of years. Either way, I don't think anyone in the org will ever admit that. I'm glad we are finally getting some production out of him though and he has been able to stay healthy, hopefully that continues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NcFinest9erFan Posted August 14, 2020 Share Posted August 14, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NcFinest9erFan Posted August 14, 2020 Share Posted August 14, 2020 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NcFinest9erFan Posted August 14, 2020 Share Posted August 14, 2020 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 4 hours ago, NcFinest9erFan said: Don't do either of those. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N4L Posted August 15, 2020 Author Share Posted August 15, 2020 1 hour ago, Forge said: Don't do either of those. If they were going to do it, they would have already imo They don't need to do the full amount for either guy. They could do 6m for Jimmy that would get spread out over 3 years. 4m in savings, 4m in dead space next year if we trade/cut him I feel like we should do it, any cap savings we get this year will roll over, and then if we cut him the savings will be used to pay the dead space. So it's really a net zero transaction Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GW21 Posted August 16, 2020 Share Posted August 16, 2020 On 8/14/2020 at 8:30 PM, N4L said: If they were going to do it, they would have already imo They don't need to do the full amount for either guy. They could do 6m for Jimmy that would get spread out over 3 years. 4m in savings, 4m in dead space next year if we trade/cut him I feel like we should do it, any cap savings we get this year will roll over, and then if we cut him the savings will be used to pay the dead space. So it's really a net zero transaction I’d do the Jimmy deal but probably not Ford at this point. I’m assuming the restructures would basically make them uncutable moving forward. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.