Jump to content

Nacho Simulation Football League (Season 19 - Taco Bowl XIX POSTED)


Recommended Posts

On 21/05/2020 at 2:00 AM, TheKillerNacho said:

Well before I commit any time working to make Season 20 a reality, let's just take a head count.

 

@Counselor


Who's in and who's out? There was quite a few of you who mentioned you may drop out after this season, but I don't know how much of it was sarcasm or just being heated in the moment.

 

Those who have already said they're interested in returning:

Tk3
Glen
bucsfan
Scalamania
swoosh
Ruskie
Whicker (if no replacement can be found)

Those who said they are not returning:

pwny

I'm happy to return.

I'd be up for a shakeup re: divisions or even a full redraft if those were on the cards, but also happy to tick with that status quo.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, khodder said:

I'm happy to return.

I'd be up for a shakeup re: divisions or even a full redraft if those were on the cards, but also happy to tick with that status quo.

As the owner of 1.1 I agree with a redraft

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, khodder said:

I feel like it would have to be randomised and be snake of some nature.

You do you though boo.

As the owner of no good players 

I am down for a redraft

Link to post
Share on other sites

But here's an idea:

We have a redraft, but before we do that, we select a handful of players that we don't want to lose from this season. We can call these players "keepers", and we can use some sort of system, perhaps a point system, called "tags" to pay for these "keepers". Whoever we don't tag and 'keep', gets put into the draft to be redrafted.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

No, a redraft makes no sense. If there was a need to reduce the teams from 20 to 16, then a division realignment and a separate talent disbursement draft would be necessary

But there is no reason, after 19 seasons, to do something we have never done. 

Presumably, the status quo holds and we look to replace the 1-2 owners who are ready to move on.

I don’t really think anything out of the ordinary makes any sense here

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, RuskieTitan said:

But here's an idea:

We have a redraft, but before we do that, we select a handful of players that we don't want to lose from this season. We can call these players "keepers", and we can use some sort of system, perhaps a point system, called "tags" to pay for these "keepers". Whoever we don't tag and 'keep', gets put into the draft to be redrafted.

It’s complicated, but hear me out

I think QBs need to be most costly than kickers, so as long as we work that into the system I think it can work

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Tk3 said:

No, a redraft makes no sense. If there was a need to reduce the teams from 20 to 16, then a division realignment and a separate talent disbursement draft would be necessary

But there is no reason, after 19 seasons, to do something we have never done. 

Presumably, the status quo holds and we look to replace the 1-2 owners who are ready to move on.

I don’t really think anything out of the ordinary makes any sense here

It doesn’t make sense

but I have 1.1 and it fits my narrative 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Tk3 said:

You cannot have my Lamar /s

I mean I would take Vince Wilfork

but you worry about your rb 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...