Jump to content

Skins fan comes in peace


LoganF89

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, SteelKing728 said:

Why is this even a talking point?

It's a talking point because of the bazillions of cryptic tweets sent out by Diggs over the last 2 weeks or so.  It's riled up a bunch of people.  (People may think I'm riled up over it, but I'm not.  It's just a valid talking point if he clearly doesn't want to be there)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, swede700 said:

It's a talking point because of the bazillions of cryptic tweets sent out by Diggs over the last 2 weeks or so.  It's riled up a bunch of people.  (People may think I'm riled up over it, but I'm not.  It's just a valid talking point if he clearly doesn't want to be there)

But that projection is based on collective negative reactions to those tweets. 

It could be the polar opposite: the cryptic messages could be because he wants to stay in Minnesota his entire career.

Who knows..?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteelKing728 said:

But that projection is based on collective negative reactions to those tweets. 

It could be the polar opposite: the cryptic messages could be because he wants to stay in Minnesota his entire career.

Who knows..?

That's why they're "cryptic" haha. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, SemperFeist said:

I’m going to laugh if the Vikings come out and announce a contract restructure with Diggs. 

I was thinking along these lines too. Give Diggs a raise but try to do so in a way to help the 2020 cap position. Not sure what that would like but I feel that is a more likely outcome than a trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know they could do that (based on that long, drawn out discussion that I had with @Cearbhall I think), but with 4 years left on the deal,  I'd be surprised if that happened.  I'd think they'd be far more likely to do it with Danielle, giving him a raise, since he has a similar structure of a deal, and has proven to be possibly even more important and causes less issues.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, NoDakViking said:

It won't happen, but what if WAS  offered #2 straight up?

It would be tough to pass that up. Chase Young or trade it to MIA/LV with multiple first round picks. If they could find a way to trade Diggs and get 2 firsts out of it, I'd be on board. That's coming from a huge advocate for keeping Diggs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, vikingsrule said:

I was thinking along these lines too. Give Diggs a raise but try to do so in a way to help the 2020 cap position. Not sure what that would like but I feel that is a more likely outcome than a trade.

Most contracts have a restructure option built in. Teams can exercise it whether the player wants to or not. We saw the Vikings do it with Eric Kendricks’ contract last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...